From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thelema314@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91B57EC41
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:45:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAJ7hh1DRVd+2m2dsb2JhbABEhU28JwgjAQEBAQEICQsdJ4IeAQEBBBICJAgBGxwCAwwGBQsNCRYPCQMCAQIBEREBBQEcEwgBAR6HTwEDD5xhCQOMKIJ2hHoKGScNWYh1AQUMi1SDSIMjA5VzhWSIdD+ELQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,639,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="178729576"
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Oct 2012 14:45:50 +0200
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so1079600iea.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=VIakfO0CtqDcHoEAbmb8sgTRVcNpWorh2Oj+isE7X8A=;
        b=vvLjulGhCoMkkWMMU7XM+KhkQicx4dW6LtsQFgFXUsChWU1Ji/XVKX5Zl0hFiKxFUC
         upRgNFs6EiONWAWAKPTmJeWii7Y4pePJLR7oF5YaRkGRqvW2AfIJ/XRhS7jQMPV0ba9U
         NjR/pKzelrhzaJCWXZ1n5LlExpX15sRNE2FYm0MJgyb+MxHF+3d96j3qZOVB6dcHYadn
         85JtmijZFbV91j4vh1baxYRzEMs+NUzzurDZWdf/gCHaoVF29xxdCVbkJz8JuGfR5wZs
         guI+2Dwzzibj68l4VfI/n0zFq/acfXkJYZlB/CnWs7MSig7pEC5jkSi/dE+6VKxcVHTI
         ipVw==
Received: by 10.50.17.200 with SMTP id q8mr2251408igd.46.1351082749426;
        Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.73] (99-121-78-10.lightspeed.lnngmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.121.78.10])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1807543igh.0.2012.10.24.05.45.47
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5087E301.2090201@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:45:53 -0400
From: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <CAC3Lx=YHyYDqja1qiADBW1O9vXTHN0CCiAqPXrYWi7b0Eg8RFQ@mail.gmail.com> <5087C409.3030203@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <CAC3Lx=ZoMeXadJrbg8Od9ayekNih+Xs_QprnRtp_Ce_-H3bYVQ@mail.gmail.com> <5087E16C.8020503@coherentgraphics.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5087E16C.8020503@coherentgraphics.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Behaviour of an OCaml program: any possible GC
 improvement?

On 10/24/2012 8:39 AM, John Whitington wrote:
> David MENTRE wrote:
>> <spontaneous>
>> [2]     84.6    0.03  449.61                 caml_call_gc [2]
>>                  0.00  449.61  755484/755484 caml_garbage_collection [3]
> <spontaneous> means gprof can't find the calling function(s). Are you 
> sure you've used the -p both for compiling all source files and also 
> when linking them into the final executable?

This line in the original profile might explain:
>    9.79    347.23    52.01    88113     0.00     0.00  camlMap__map_181
I'm guessing there's a lot of calls to Map.map, and this is causing all 
the garbage.  As part of the stdlib, it wouldn't automatically be 
compiled for profiling, no?

E.