From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DEB67F249 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 01:54:03 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am0BAOZ1kFCGoCGihWdsb2JhbABEhhe6C4N9AQEBCgsLBRYngh4BAQUjDwEFQAEQCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAYgCqX2SXYEgileFKIETA4hXiWyDMoVpjVc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,683,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="160945169" Received: from postman2.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.162]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 01:54:01 +0100 Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman2.riken.jp [127.0.0.1]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA30126045A; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:53:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D9661270063; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:53:50 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <5090769E.4060008@riken.jp> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:53:50 +0900 From: Francois Berenger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIELDvG56bGk=?= CC: caml-list References: <508F22BD.7010103@riken.jp> <508F3D3D.3070600@riken.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.10.31.4816 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why should I use .mli files? On 10/30/2012 09:28 PM, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > > > Le mardi, 30 octobre 2012 à 03:36, Francois Berenger a écrit : > >>> For me, a program that lacks mli files means lack of design, abstraction and documentation and hence equates with rubbish. >> >> >> Thanks for the compliment. > Oh don't take it personally it also happens to me. > >> To my defence, my main programming goal because of my employer >> and colleagues is to deliver fast and correct (software) in order to >> investigate research ideas. >> We don't deliver libraries or things targeting at a wide developer > > > I personnally find none of these arguments very compelling. "don't take it personally" ;)