From: "Harrison, John R" <john.r.harrison@intel.com>
To: "Ashish Agarwal" <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
Cc: "Caml-list List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509223F0BF55E74FA1247D17207E7A0C01E7CAF0@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8be5ae20709200642s598b5570l6ebd5be1a2b6ce0f@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]
Another possibility: I've used "f ** g" for function composition of "f"
and "g"
in some of my code. It seems quite intuitive to me, a sort of
multiplication
operation in the "monoid" of functions. Maybe people accustomed to using
"**" for the power function will find it weird, though.
John.
________________________________
From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr
[mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Ashish Agarwal
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:42 AM
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
> It would be useful that experimented OCaml people suggest a
replacement for the heavily used composition operator ( << ) that is now
reserved for camlp4...
After reading all your posts and all previous posts I could find, I've
started using (<--) and (-->), but I also wish there was an agreed upon
notation for this. I have no confidence that my choices are good.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4268 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-21 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 14:36 Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-17 18:59 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
2007-09-17 19:45 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-17 22:24 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 5:39 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-18 8:53 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 9:09 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 14:12 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-18 16:42 ` Jon Harrop
2007-09-18 20:41 ` skaller
2007-09-19 19:49 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-19 21:56 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-09-20 13:42 ` Ashish Agarwal
2007-09-20 18:37 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2007-09-21 20:58 ` Harrison, John R [this message]
2007-09-21 21:44 ` Karl Zilles
2007-09-20 14:39 Aaron Bohannon
2007-09-22 15:22 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-09-22 15:43 ` Daniel Bünzli
2007-09-22 23:55 ` Christian Stork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509223F0BF55E74FA1247D17207E7A0C01E7CAF0@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=john.r.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=agarwal1975@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).