Another possibility: I’ve used “f
** g” for function composition of “f” and “g”
in some of my code. It seems quite
intuitive to me, a sort of multiplication
operation in the “monoid” of
functions. Maybe people accustomed to using
“**” for the power function will
find it weird, though.
John.
From:
caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Ashish Agarwal
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007
6:42 AM
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Having
'<<', why to use '|>' ?
> It would be useful that experimented OCaml people
suggest a replacement for the heavily used composition operator ( << )
that is now reserved for camlp4...
After reading all your posts and all previous posts I could find, I've started
using (<--) and (-->), but I also wish there was an agreed upon notation
for this. I have no confidence that my choices are good.