From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <berenger@riken.jp>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F217C7EE20
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:19:54 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsEAOuIqVCGoCGvgWdsb2JhbABFv1KCUgQEgSoBARYmJ4IeAQEFOEARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBARCHeb8pjDSBZoMnA4hYjSSFa41WgUwH
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,275,1352070000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="182064573"
Received: from postman3.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.175])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2012 02:19:53 +0100
Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman3.riken.jp [127.0.0.1])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 59D1A38380C7
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:19:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1AC323820138
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:19:50 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <50A98936.9090009@riken.jp>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:19:50 +0900
From: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <20cf301af4932e938004ce13462e@google.com> <50A333C0.2060801@riken.jp> <BLU172-W33A8AE944BB71713DF7453C5530@phx.gbl> <CAPFanBErSzvN9v-QYrM+rAgt0XBL11w-xX2W+3TCuveJQBa1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBErSzvN9v-QYrM+rAgt0XBL11w-xX2W+3TCuveJQBa1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.11.19.11220
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] =?ISO-8859-1?Q?OCaml_messages_in_French_/_message?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?s_d=27OCaml_en_fran=E7ais?=

On 11/16/2012 06:24 PM, Gabriel Scherer wrote:
>> I have some questions :
>> - Is it the right place to talk about that?
>
> Yes, definitely. I have more reserves about encouraging people to
> participate to the discussion in French: given that a notable
> proportion of the people subscribed to the list don't understand
> french, I'm not sure it's nice to send them unwanted french messages
> or take them out of the discussion.
>
> (There are other non-english-speaking communities using OCaml, for
> example in Russia and Japan, and they apparently haven't felt the need
> to communicate through the caml-list in their native language.)

But maybe they should communicate on caml-list in English to less
fragment the community...