From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D2D7EEAF for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=pra; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au8AAJUu+VDB/BfVlGdsb2JhbABFvkwOAQEBAQkLCQkUAySCHgEBBThAARALGAkMCg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBQIBAYgZvB6OBIM1A5YMhWuNVA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,491,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="168908875" Received: from msa04.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.213]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2013 12:19:04 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([90.44.19.86]) by mwinf5d31 with ME id pPK31k00r1rRe5E03PK3KS; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:19:04 +0100 Message-ID: <50F92FA9.8050707@frisch.fr> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:19:05 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anil Madhavapeddy CC: Thomas Gazagnaire , OCaml mailing-list , Mirage List References: <6833F17C-B642-4ED9-8C8F-2665A9742845@ocamlpro.com> <50F831B6.6020404@frisch.fr> <224865B3-055C-4E03-AA42-9F962AD516D7@recoil.org> <50F92486.2020704@frisch.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] beta-release of OPAM On 01/18/2013 11:42 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 18 Jan 2013, at 10:31, Alain Frisch wrote: >> Shouldn't the package be called simply "trunk", without a reference to a version number? > > Yeah, but OPAM also has compiler version constraints, so that you can mark a package as requiring {>=4.00} for example. Understood. > $ mkdir -p my-repo/packages > $ opam remote add localdev my-repo > > $ opam update > > $ opam install Thanks. That's what I've done. I've sent my first "pull request" for the inclusion of a new package in OPAM :-) Are there plans to provide a more direct way to submit proposals for new packages? If I understand correctly, the current scheme requires to create an account on github, fork the opam-repository, clone the fork locally, create and commit the package locally, push it to github, and then create a pull request. Admittedly, this is not difficult once you're familiar with GIT and github, but I can imagine that it will still discourage some people from submitting their first package. What about a simple web interface to upload a .tar.gz of the package description, for instance? It should not be too hard to automate the treatment of uploaded package descriptions. Alain