From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF597EEB2 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:52:15 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net) identity=pra; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@mail.etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFADNXAVGwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABEgmu7XBZzgh4BAQQBQAEBLAoCDwsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAhaHegcDCKoxhDoBBY8QBo1SgymWD4EcjyyCeg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,530,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="169530377" Received: from mail.etorok.net ([176.9.138.55]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2013 16:52:14 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:2a02:2f02:1022:e131:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:2f02:1022:e131:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d]) by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 791D346B4 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:52:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net; s=MAILOUT; t=1359042733; bh=9XAhLKGnZg3l/d/78Ho7znbcw1NL02PskzTWamE92gE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UIa2sLSpcl0K87EuqJZ0s9TYAU17TgIuj5hneYF4lSXlFvt6o5QgJtjqUvZp7rzCf lbAKeMl7jkVW3p2nXDWRLRevUQZIG988/0ens6YwDW9NYMW5l5nBZiOGhR/TmK12BU KVn49wSmDx4y8YTo23vd9jrb3J8na9r3ZHpkMmsk= Message-ID: <510158AD.4040506@etorok.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:52:13 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <510145A5.6030807@frisch.fr> In-Reply-To: <510145A5.6030807@frisch.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Working Group: the future of syntax extensions in OCaml, after camlp4 On 01/24/2013 04:31 PM, Alain Frisch wrote: > > The discussion on the mailing list will start in a few days, to give some time for interested people to join. In the meanwhile, Leo has written a blog post to get the discussion started: > > http://www.lpw25.net/2013/01/23/camlp4-alternative-part-1.html > > You can also read about -ppx: > > http://www.lexifi.com/blog/syntax-extensions-without-camlp4 > http://www.lexifi.com/blog/syntax-extensions-without-camlp4-lets-do-it Interesting posts, could these be made available in the ocaml.org/ocaml planet news feed too? On 01/24/2013 04:31 PM, Alain Frisch wrote: > (Please consider sharing information about your use of camlp4 > and camlp4-based extensions, even if you don't plan to participate > to the working group discussions!) Will do. Best regards, --Edwin