From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA0B7F30A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri,  8 Mar 2013 19:49:18 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net) identity=pra;
  client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@mail.etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail.etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAGkxOlGwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABDhDbAGIFbFnSCLAEBAQQBAj0BASwKAg8LGAkWDwkDAgECARYvEwgCiBADqDyEOwEFjhIGjxMWgyqUGII+gR6PVIMM
X-IPAS-Result: AgEFAGkxOlGwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABDhDbAGIFbFnSCLAEBAQQBAj0BASwKAg8LGAkWDwkDAgECARYvEwgCiBADqDyEOwEFjhIGjxMWgyqUGII+gR6PVIMM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,809,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="4714079"
Received: from mail.etorok.net ([176.9.138.55])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2013 19:49:17 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:2f09:40b0:e9:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:2f09:40b0:e9:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d])
	by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A130F46D5
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri,  8 Mar 2013 19:49:16 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net;
	s=MAILOUT; t=1362768556;
	bh=4jkvDNXep8Xvjo08cwRRBQywM1iVsaTE8uQV/B6I6Zk=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=NEH9I69M8H0S3SSh0+r4tySz4dkYPXJBOJ++ryJWkQmGBWfFUkK/P/9W5jPUsjhRu
	 gb4FdO3Lw2Ne6FqoN7NifC1vs2K/UA9cUVkF77JRr9XerMEVZiY5cIygv7do9RK3Pd
	 ZNIHrpGIl8ZZzRhsnMp5N/J7kJEDx4p5nUCru5MA=
Message-ID: <513A32AC.9010709@etorok.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:49:16 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <CAE1DttAcGJS2Q9eGnnBmRmO6T6HHEk0mL8kHt-_Bne-QtCAM5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE1DttAcGJS2Q9eGnnBmRmO6T6HHEk0mL8kHt-_Bne-QtCAM5g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OpenGL mailing-list

On 03/08/2013 08:27 PM, Florent Monnier wrote:
>> [...] http://lists.ocaml.org/, to improve their visibility, [...]
> 
> What would you think about creating an ocaml-opengl mailing list too?
> (for generic ocaml/opengl)
> 
> Most camelers are not interested by the topic, so we could post more
> things about it there without fear of annoying other people.
> 

Would OpenGL discussions be so high volume?
I don't remember seeing (m)any OpenGL related discussions since I've joined this ML.

Or is it about trying to unify the various existing OpenGL bindings?

--Edwin