From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alain.frisch@lexifi.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02C77F30A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:57:26 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  alain.frisch@lexifi.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain.frisch@lexifi.com";
  x-sender="alain.frisch@lexifi.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  alain.frisch@lexifi.com) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain.frisch@lexifi.com";
  x-sender="alain.frisch@lexifi.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr) identity=helo;
  client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain.frisch@lexifi.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwAAH/fPlHB/BfUe2dsb2JhbABDwX2CYYFrDgEBCwsmAyWCKAEBBThAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIE69ukDWPDQeDQAOWVYV6jgY
X-IPAS-Result: AtwAAH/fPlHB/BfUe2dsb2JhbABDwX2CYYFrDgEBCwsmAyWCKAEBBThAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIE69ukDWPDQeDQAOWVYV6jgY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,829,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="5709144"
Received: from msa03.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.212])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2013 08:57:26 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.120] ([86.195.25.207])
	by mwinf5d63 with ME
	id AXxR1l00U4U5yvJ03XxRSA; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:57:25 +0100
Message-ID: <513EDFE5.6010408@lexifi.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:57:25 +0100
From: Alain Frisch <alain.frisch@lexifi.com>
Organization: LexiFi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maxence Guesdon <Maxence.Guesdon@inria.fr>
CC: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <CADKNfhKDC-EwsKkjZ+uqbary5Cy48k=+J_GX4dzAMCi5v0hsNg@mail.gmail.com> <87036D5B-C968-4425-9C6C-04FF45466739@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <20130311123823.6761f2c4@alcazar>
In-Reply-To: <20130311123823.6761f2c4@alcazar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Validation-by: alain.frisch@lexifi.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Record field disambiguation in 4.01

On 03/11/2013 12:38 PM, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Maybe additional aliases with a naming convention could be useful, e.g.
>   -w 4.01-A
> could mean "all flags as defined in 4.01 release" ?

Warning numbers are allocated incrementally, so this can be emulated by 
-w 1..XX where XX is the last warning number for a specific release. 
However, it happens once in a while that the exact meaning of an 
existing warning changes between releases, so this is not bullet proof.

-- Alain