From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747227F30A for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:35:32 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of carette@mcmaster.ca) identity=pra; client-ip=130.113.64.67; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="carette@mcmaster.ca"; x-sender="carette@mcmaster.ca"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of carette@mcmaster.ca) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=130.113.64.67; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="carette@mcmaster.ca"; x-sender="carette@mcmaster.ca"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@pinegw01.uts.mcmaster.ca) identity=helo; client-ip=130.113.64.67; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="carette@mcmaster.ca"; x-sender="postmaster@pinegw01.uts.mcmaster.ca"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioCAG9KP1GCcUBDkWdsb2JhbABDDsFwgmWBXQ4BAQEBCQsSFCiCKAEBBThAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIELEikAiPDQeDQAOcUY1GWw X-IPAS-Result: AioCAG9KP1GCcUBDkWdsb2JhbABDDsFwgmWBXQ4BAQEBCQsSFCiCKAEBBThAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIELEikAiPDQeDQAOcUY1GWw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,831,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="5828776" Received: from pinegw01.uts.mcmaster.ca ([130.113.64.67]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Mar 2013 16:35:31 +0100 Received: from Dura7.UTS.McMaster.CA (dura7.UTS.McMaster.CA [130.113.196.62]) by pinegw01.uts.mcmaster.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2CFTRu3030480; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:29 -0400 Received: from cgpsrv2.cis.mcmaster.ca (univmail.CIS.McMaster.CA [130.113.64.46]) by Dura7.UTS.McMaster.CA (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r2CFT35I030750; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:03 -0400 Received: from [130.113.68.27] (account carette@univmail.cis.mcmaster.ca [130.113.68.27] verified) by cgpsrv2.cis.mcmaster.ca (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTPSA id 448461538; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:06 -0400 Message-ID: <513F49BE.5010606@mcmaster.ca> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:02 -0400 From: Jacques Carette User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacques Garrigue CC: Yaron Minsky , Mailing OCaML References: <513DC595.9020006@frisch.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version-Mac: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.3.12.151815 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_300_399 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' X-Spam-Flag: NO Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Record field disambiguation in 4.01 On 13-03-12 11:05 AM, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > I have improved the warning (revision 13395), so that it tells you the > types involved. This should actually help in some hairy situations. Would it also make sense to give the fully qualified names for the ambiguous fields? This should also give a strong hint as to where the conflict comes from. (another) Jacques