From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48C07EE7A for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:36:31 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.215.172; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.172 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.172; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ea0-f172.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.215.172; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ea0-f172.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmABAMZ4UVHRVdesk2dsb2JhbABDhhC9coEHFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEWoIfAQEFJxkBGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECAQ8CEQEFARwGDQEFAgEBh30BAw+jO4wygXGBCoRUChknDVmIfAEFDIw7gksHg0ADj0OBKIQcgWCFf4Vtgzk/hC4 X-IPAS-Result: AmABAMZ4UVHRVdesk2dsb2JhbABDhhC9coEHFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEWoIfAQEFJxkBGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECAQ8CEQEFARwGDQEFAgEBh30BAw+jO4wygXGBCoRUChknDVmIfAEFDIw7gksHg0ADj0OBKIQcgWCFf4Vtgzk/hC4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,911,1355094000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="7864303" Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 26 Mar 2013 11:36:31 +0100 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z7so1068855eaf.17 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:36:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=oWmUSVsbwR0Q+CpS80+uZCvAaC7Qdhng3brJIGRr7MI=; b=rn5/sBYeMN8IdW+wRWhspUZRVDdKYhHFXrazefY6r2xBcsIYAdVGWZbu+O9wx1NA/s V72w/HRRGFB1zGfwFAAlzQSaQ9JDZWtzx5euaNeZY9yMFSe4Yruuo+UVc/N3VB96A1FT Y7UDfylbPsCNnqwvaEvZXpXUYVQ0UG51uThroudzkf3NneS451+xLj0CNWn08DQ/3ePc CCSj0W5PS40+tKXs4FaVK1YvdTqIMntXVlQO8yqM/wEP5+gJ9rEINcZwcM8Rpn41CINy Y3VPAweQDKinpvoqUmZvMdwZCMzVZ1Igzh1eBPt1BRKKXJ0L8Rr1//92Nbv96+psu03x +4Ow== X-Received: by 10.14.111.72 with SMTP id v48mr43895451eeg.11.1364294190576; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.178.73.213] (lpdlaptop2.epfl.ch. [128.178.73.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm24210717eem.1.2013.03.26.03.36.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51517A27.9040403@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:36:23 +0100 From: Nicolas Braud-Santoni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130325 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francois Berenger CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com> <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> <5147BDF9.8050003@riken.jp> In-Reply-To: <5147BDF9.8050003@riken.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2QOVAVWQPGWRNFUSPXLGU" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2QOVAVWQPGWRNFUSPXLGU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/03/2013 02:23, Francois Berenger wrote: > On 03/18/2013 08:26 PM, Kakadu wrote: >> Please, don't feed the troll >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Malcolm Matalka >> wrote: >>> The biggest advantage for me is Ocaml is simpler than Haskell IMO. >>> >>> adrian.alexander.may@gmail.com writes: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:49:17 UTC+8, circ ular wrote: >>>>> What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to >>>>> Haskell? >>>> >>>> case you of >>>> man -> haskell >>>> mouse -> ocaml > > Last time I used it, the Haskell "ecosystem" around the language > (tools and libraries) was quite advanced (they had an OPAM-like > long time ago for example). As a Haskell programmer, I can tell you that Cabal (Haskell's OPAM-like) is somewhat quirky, and can become very painful to work around when hitting some corner-cases. For now, I have had no such experience with OPAM ;) ------enig2QOVAVWQPGWRNFUSPXLGU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRUXorAAoJEPv4tP2UoeSesbsP/2hNtSMrEtmLjNoX3BQtqKoe +KeY/U9UjlfUEMFzz+jCVYpw+n+zPuGkzWXdzwjGFxmxETR8Wq5kvbatptGjQ/Di tr28pr8gUh1fqR/jFjQiMS9dZb3W3PnyJ+hbrhQEj/NiJkSBzV45sAmmMmEZShZe 9C0cbdIDSm6+/fxcEX2DBLjiFpg1/ZLYtnArLbtwk4TthEngzvJaQzRQTtlN8dH+ dgXQhTOmoMXzHCpvPRZcKPoKD8RaKMhEt6dB31R7zFpRZkAX5otHZr2vzBK7yxd8 fo7fO4VuiWJ6gvKmxxZGAkNeS05Mvp1w8jfGZorD1POPTjYqdx+6tKFqIL5lPx1n 0hEmN+skJUXpukHY/EmlBhYJeDVbxe/A9J7DdDltVc700+K4DYik36jJCGUD51nu 4X0sLWXfchjY4SbgpDURsnOYULWPLse8vP2/sCbAZTFzplizZ6Hwx1v1NPLpeTs4 vpO3jDTZObEngFqGP6NeC+Qv1Ft3bqei2ioaEJOsjzfM+tRKTBds9bm4kzTVmpJi x5H3ZKnIfpSjI70mJ6bBbl911m6hoorotHPR0M7NvPJ/WlSiWKANeimNVvYspHVf JrsJ3TZSNDXGawCljOCwotpuZrThG4XKebMTar9hFazG/6wk9SiIGppH7+b30abm aXq+rPDuV7+MK8oiNgBz =lxi5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2QOVAVWQPGWRNFUSPXLGU--