From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00DE7EE51 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 09:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiQFAGwcn1GGoCGigGdsb2JhbABZgzgBwiADAYEXDgEBCRYHPoIjAQEDAjIBBUARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgJDLoCjip6FoM+A4kdjh6GHo5A X-IPAS-Result: AiQFAGwcn1GGoCGigGdsb2JhbABZgzgBwiADAYEXDgEBCRYHPoIjAQEDAjIBBUARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgJDLoCjip6FoM+A4kdjh6GHo5A X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,733,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="15536953" Received: from postman2.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.162]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 May 2013 09:55:45 +0200 Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman2.riken.jp [127.0.0.1]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A53C126054E for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 16:55:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2ABFF1270063 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 16:55:34 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <519F1CF6.7050007@riken.jp> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 16:55:34 +0900 From: Francois Berenger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2013.5.24.74229 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] French study on security and functional languages On 05/24/2013 04:02 PM, David MENTRE wrote: > Hello, > > For those reading French, ANSSI (French agency for information > security) published a study on security and functional languages, with > a set of recommendations. OCaml is apparently well studied: > http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/fr/anssi/publications/publications-scientifiques/autres-publications/lafosec-securite-et-langages-fonctionnels.html The document "État des lieux des langages fonctionnels" is interesting even out of the context of computer security. http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/LaFoSec_-_Etat_des_lieux_des_langages_fonctionnels.pdf PS: and, most importantly, page 55 gives good marks to OCaml compared to other languages (so that we can start to troll now) :-) > """ > Cette étude, menée par un consortium composé de Saferiver, Normation, > AMOSSYS et du CEDRIC dans le cadre formel d’un marché du SGDSN, avait > pour objectif principal d’étudier l’adéquation des langages > fonctionnels pour le développement d’applications de sécurité, de > proposer le cas échéant des recommandations, et de mettre en pratique > certaines de ces recommandations. > """ > > Best regards, > david >