From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121347EE51 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of misterherr@freenet.de) identity=pra; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of misterherr@freenet.de) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mout3.freenet.de) identity=helo; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="postmaster@mout3.freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIBAH56plHDBFxddmdsb2JhbABagmiEDL5JgQoWDgEKCwsJEQYlgiMBAQUjVRELGAICBRYIAwICCQMCAQIBNBETBgIBAYd2AQMQA6dsiDsJQQxoAYgYgSaNdBaCLYEUA51ZjjM X-IPAS-Result: AtIBAH56plHDBFxddmdsb2JhbABagmiEDL5JgQoWDgEKCwsJEQYlgiMBAQUjVRELGAICBRYIAwICCQMCAQIBNBETBgIBAYd2AQMQA6dsiDsJQQxoAYgYgSaNdBaCLYEUA51ZjjM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,766,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="16126465" Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 May 2013 00:04:50 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #3) id 1UhoUD-0001y8-O2 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:04:49 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:38936 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #3) id 1UhoUD-0001Na-Hn for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:04:49 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.19] (port=47492 helo=9.mx.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #3) id 1UhoRg-0005n8-2e for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:02:12 +0200 Received: from cl-252.ham-02.de.sixxs.net ([2001:6f8:1c00:fb::2]:57698 helo=suse123-intel.home.loc) by 9.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #3) id 1UhoRf-0005s2-Kq for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:02:11 +0200 Message-ID: <51A67AE2.2000000@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 00:02:10 +0200 From: "Mr. Herr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> <20130526150008.GA2014@siouxsie> <20130526234911.41866xca7wgoirfb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <51A30E01.5070300@freenet.de> <51A3C03C.4000205@freenet.de> <51A3C3D6.9020003@etorok.net> <51A3CBBD.8040609@freenet.de> <51A4052F.7000700@riken.jp> <51A4F822.8070407@freenet.de> <51A52CE3.6060002@freenet.de> <51A669A9.2070505@freenet.de> <87r4gppk3k.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87r4gppk3k.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems to get larger user base ... (Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's variables) Is Ocaml scripting totally out? Yet I read about a project to produce a native toplevel. I bet even in byte code Ocaml is on par with a lot of other scripting/programming languages. /Str. Am 29.05.2013 23:11, schrieb Malcolm Matalka: > Why would you need to roll out opem libraries for production? You > should build a binary and distribute the binary to the machines. > > I prefer per-user install. I have, numerous times, felt suffocated on > systems that require going through some bureaucracy to install a package > (which is one reason I use NixOS everywhere I can). > > /M > > "Mr. Herr" writes: > >> Am 29.05.2013 00:43, schrieb Paolo Donadeo: >>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Mr. Herr >> > wrote: >>> >>> I see, this is over and out. Very constructive. >>> >>> >>> Mr. Herr, sorry for the irony, so I'll be serious, as you wish. >>> >>> What kind of constructive comment can you realistically expect in reply to "Linux >>> is a server"? >>> >>> Linux is an operating system, not a "server", nor a "service". I spend 99% of my >>> programming time on a Linux box since 20 years, and the only services running here >>> are the system services like CUPS. The choice of OPAM's designers to install >>> everything in the user home directory has been explained by Anil very clearly. >>> >>> I only add that I always installed GODI in ~/.godi rather than in /opt . >>> >>> Your comment was inaccurate, so my reply is ironical, but not harsh. >>> >>> >> Indeed "Linux is a server" is not well said. >> >> I meant to say "Linux is a multiuser system" and it has always been, so one can >> reasonably expect software installation to deal with it with ease. >> >> There are certainly advantages in the ~/.opam design decision, but I have yet to find >> out how to roll out my ~/.opam libraries for production. >> >> And very true, I was not prepared for irony on this point. >> >> /Str.