From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D5281799 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 03:10:25 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgAAMDL8VGGoCGvmWdsb2JhbABagzsBvjOBKg4BAQEBAQgLCwcUKIIkAQEFOFELGAklDwJGEwYCAQGIDAy5BpAEFoNqA4kojjeBKYR6jk0 X-IPAS-Result: ArgAAMDL8VGGoCGvmWdsb2JhbABagzsBvjOBKg4BAQEBAQgLCwcUKIIkAQEFOFELGAklDwJGEwYCAQGIDAy5BpAEFoNqA4kojjeBKYR6jk0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,746,1367964000"; d="scan'208";a="22293189" Received: from postman3.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.175]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2013 03:10:24 +0200 Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman3.riken.jp [127.0.0.1]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E1F838380C6 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:10:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8EA1A3820139 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:10:19 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <51F1CC76.60802@riken.jp> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:10:14 +0900 From: Francois Berenger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <51ECF4EB.1060301@libertysurf.fr> <1672419877.217810363.1374484053368.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net> <20130723153956.605104b3@xivilization.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2013.7.26.10022 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] which ocaml build system On 07/26/2013 06:45 AM, Martin DeMello wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Marek Kubica wrote: >> >>> I would like to gather thoughts on that in the ocaml.org website, >>> because actually its advice is 'make + OcamlMakefile' and 'Omake', >>> and I am not sure it is the best advice. >> >> I suppose this advice used to be good, but today maybe not as much >> anymore. > > I have an old (and fairly small) project that I've tried at least > thrice to migrate off OcamlMakefile to something more > modern/ocaml-specific, and failed each time (after spending 1-2 > evenings on it). I'll give it another go and report back on my > experience, but at least historically OCamlMakefile was the easiest > thing to get up and running. > > You can see the pretty simple makefile here: > https://github.com/martindemello/varix/blob/master/makefile - I can't > remember exactly what difficulties I had with ocamlbuild and omake > now. How is the parallelization of the build with OCamlMakefile? Is it good (i.e. faster than ocamlbuild)? F.