From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3372820A1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.162 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.162; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp"; x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokBAKgwMFKGoCGinGdsb2JhbABbgz+De78/gTIOAQEBAQEICwkJFCiCJQEBAwEBIxU7BQYLCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMGAgEBh3gGDLAkkhmBKY5EFoJTgTQDiTSORIEvhQCOcg X-IPAS-Result: AokBAKgwMFKGoCGinGdsb2JhbABbgz+De78/gTIOAQEBAQEICwkJFCiCJQEBAwEBIxU7BQYLCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMGAgEBh3gGDLAkkhmBKY5EFoJTgTQDiTSORIEvhQCOcg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,883,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="32391957" Received: from postman2.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.162]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2013 11:00:15 +0200 Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman2.riken.jp [127.0.0.1]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id E1BCD12601B7 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:00:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98]) by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4EA81270051 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:00:13 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <52303117.4000106@riken.jp> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:00:07 +0900 From: Francois Berenger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <522FC0C2.8080600@riken.jp> <20130911101625.6a666ed6@atmarama.noip.me> In-Reply-To: <20130911101625.6a666ed6@atmarama.noip.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2013.9.11.84815 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options On 09/11/2013 05:16 PM, Gour wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:00:50 +0900 > Francois Berenger wrote: > >> You could also clearly decouple the "engine" of your software >> from its GUI. > > And what to use for GUI? You are free to use whatever language you want for the GUI (and the engine) with such a design. As you are looking into OCaml, maybe the MLdonkey paper will be of use to you: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/07/17/89/PDF/RR-4797.pdf >> As was done in MLDonkey and plan9's sam test editor: >> http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/sam/sam.html > > Thank you, I'll take a look. My 2 cents: a productive researcher in my field is quite interested in GUIs and portability of his software. He uses Python. > Sincerely, > Gour