From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194327EE49
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:55:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net) identity=pra;
  client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@mail.etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=176.9.138.55;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail.etorok.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjgFAAdQOFKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABbgwfDPBZ0gmwBATYCOxYYAwIBAgE/GQgCiAOnYoRMAQWNfgaQBIQIiTWOSYYwi0SDJw
X-IPAS-Result: AjgFAAdQOFKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABbgwfDPBZ0gmwBATYCOxYYAwIBAgE/GQgCiAOnYoRMAQWNfgaQBIQIiTWOSYYwi0SDJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,923,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="33219750"
Received: from mail.etorok.net ([176.9.138.55])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2013 14:55:33 +0200
Received: from [172.30.42.25] (unknown [79.114.59.137])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5E6646D8
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net;
	s=mailout; t=1379422531;
	bh=Tqw03c8tyTsarbwi/tWPkqvmBnWtbxLhDOW1tPCF2uI=; l=361;
	h=Date:From:To:From;
	b=U63X2f98U/QY8UQ2Uxz5l5O1sTbydPLo4g4Cry8Konrcc89chSZAOOftUP2ETsa6Y
	 V1q1ngbMU/UKCuO8niYTNq1B36LdIoos0+cmU8mb5YJ3Taq8TV5E9D7x7YSNasydSW
	 o3zHGIsGiH831nieGeUG7SVgMJS8M680/6KNzHMo=
Message-ID: <52385142.7030402@etorok.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:55:30 +0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130821 Icedove/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [Caml-list] duplicate labels

Hi,

The following is accepted:

let foo ~x ~x () = ()
let () =
  foo ~x:4 ~x:5 ()

I tried -w A and I got no warnings with OCaml 4.01.0, is this intended?
Should I file a feature request to get a warning for this situation?

(How I got in this situation: I did an overly eager search/replace that caused the duplicate ~x)

Best regards,
--Edwin