From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41E57EE4B for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:20:03 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net) identity=pra; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@mail.etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFAP1oRVKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4wRyBHhZ0giUBAQQBQAEBOAQLCxgJJQ8CRhMIAhCHbAoIpm6EUAEFjkQGj1gWhAiJNoptg12BL4UDhhWFMYMn X-IPAS-Result: AgYFAP1oRVKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4wRyBHhZ0giUBAQQBQAEBOAQLCxgJJQ8CRhMIAhCHbAoIpm6EUAEFjkQGj1gWhAiJNoptg12BL4UDhhWFMYMn X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,991,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="28307042" Received: from mail.etorok.net ([176.9.138.55]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2013 13:20:03 +0200 Received: from [172.30.42.25] (unknown [79.114.37.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C95B46D8 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:20:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net; s=mailout; t=1380280802; bh=nVlTLJIy/7+6LtgbH8hvIc7c2mQFX6djYP9tfOLx48o=; l=900; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gFyyAP+y0kmL/0GcIVgBwNFOMl59d/d8Pf3H4Tcmf8a8M8/0bbJnLt9eB+7c6YCiF TNfpX2ISGrrQIvErslVvo3DmjHEvzMv2Z9BPQbHX3Mpw24WhbyJSoB5we4kxdSNYmi c5DfT7VpkS6KoM1/3z5gjk0m1/es2HrxZSmgMdWs= Message-ID: <524569E1.20701@etorok.net> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130927091146.54ef8c42@atmarama.noip.me> In-Reply-To: <20130927091146.54ef8c42@atmarama.noip.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [Caml-list] UFO (United Forces of OCaml) On 09/27/2013 10:11 AM, Gour wrote: > > However, there are certain things which seems like wasting of resources, > so my humble proposal is whether it is possible to make UFO - United > Forces of OCaml in order not to have too many (similar) projects > tackling the same problems. I think this is worked on under the name "OCaml Platform": http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/projects/ocamllabs/tasks/platform.html > So, my naive proposal is to try to combine forces together and produce > small(er) set of tools libraries and make it somewhat 'standard' within > community. I'd prefer if existing tools are improved, and the best one considered as "standard", rather than developing a new set of tools to replace all the existing ones. As you noticed we have too many alternatives already, and if yet another one is created we'll end up with: http://xkcd.com/927/ Best regards, --Edwin