From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com> X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90B97EE4B for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:59:39 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of 5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.51; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com"; x-sender="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of 5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.51; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com"; x-sender="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wg0-f51.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.51; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f51.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEEAPU4VFJKfVIzlGdsb2JhbABZgh+BIMF2gSIWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJQEBBUABGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHAYNAQcCh28BAw8ECJwcjFODCoQcChknDWSJAQEFDIJPjGcHhCMDmAGBL4UHiV9BgxCBPw X-IPAS-Result: AuEEAPU4VFJKfVIzlGdsb2JhbABZgh+BIMF2gSIWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJQEBBUABGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHAYNAQcCh28BAw8ECJwcjFODCoQcChknDWSJAQEFDIJPjGcHhCMDmAGBL4UHiV9BgxCBPw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1057,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="36109336" Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Oct 2013 18:59:38 +0200 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c11so9069989wgh.6 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:59:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CVKsd+Ttyyt14CakVYihM0x6EJatOes20ta3jipHdTQ=; b=u2KX007V+GvkkeipM01otV4bx3O0SDujkzrt5/nVGckPbRgaILh+HE5al+QOINvUVb NolNNhod5t2d2f+dV0K6Fasr4OalRcNVgYi/tx1yG/3KKdm+skitwTEOoTb5D1t3y2r1 zD5ehTPvtAAM4NPjaXOwyOP1dl1OG2qNcbgkhdmNwJyMoLhsla2Hm6mLdw2PdXxZJzxt BkLfFjcyPzgzl4EyH6Ux0c+zHCp4qHSBThMYM1tew4yty7KSDyqNvJNJpWDR4s3oV+n3 pSt1+3MqytwlFG7xFbFTlEFcPI7LJ2mGIMQJH2kkF7HWaNxwdb75y6JQH6UB/8bRlT1g KkXA== X-Received: by 10.180.187.51 with SMTP id fp19mr24802426wic.1.1381251579148; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.27.6.175] ([213.106.240.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm6874837wic.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52543A03.7080308@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:59:47 +0100 From: Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashish Agarwal CC: "caml-list@inria.fr" References: <52541870.7040000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamldoc ... "Warning: Module or module type BatSet.StringSet not found" On 08/10/13 16:24, Ashish Agarwal wrote: > OCamldoc has trouble finding references to modules in some cases. I wouldn't worry about it. See the opam-doc project [1], which aims to provide a more robust documentation tool. > > [1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/projects/ocamllabs/tasks/platform.html#OPAM Doc I wonder, why is ocamldoc mentioned in the User's Manual [2] if people, as you suggest, are not supposed to be worried about it and, on the other hand, there is no trace of OPAM therein. A puzzle. [2] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/