From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933CFBC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:26:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjICAB/Pb0rRVdramGdsb2JhbACZSz8BAQEBAQgJDAcTpxiBH5A3AQMCBIQMBQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,289,1246831200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="44095760"
Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2009 13:26:02 +0200
Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so643999bwz.27
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4oSusDVD0qBZ8cEVczWwOE6AjFslLd8o2WHEr9B8now=;
        b=hGrv9YI+I5buDKYEJKTbLnrrLjdsH/EfNthroDiNloZU5qqwgJjmnv/iX9TDqs5wDt
         I+9SyAj2koZkMkb99QqTY+VrS+JgmGQ2sm2MMvKx72o6EddZfRMzoY9qcm5Qnm3fw22g
         NoSlNx078rLUuvpbaXMmfh+JiCpO7eNnN+3HI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=oemLQjnbDurcIkyQib4Yx8GqNPzWG5IoFKQxa9dj4czhouBO7ytS4CUD+U3uWCfR5l
         cJ12wR6Emh9MID3Si363vKVOQ4hHjty0wFJ8Ai1BRIS90KZEsuvH9qYneXOab6X4TLnD
         vQ+8B4Gjie6pY6A35Q0estzHfiH9Ja0o8G0NY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.118.207 with SMTP id w15mr5437166bkq.126.1248866761289; 
	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200907281838.11920.peng.zang@gmail.com>
References: <200907282201.17733.san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr>
	 <200907282242.34512.san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr>
	 <200907282250.40471.san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr>
	 <200907281838.11920.peng.zang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:26:00 +0000
Message-ID: <527cf6bc0907290426u65443773h3f778a36151c1537@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml icon
From: blue storm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
To: peng.zang@gmail.com
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr,
	Vu Ngoc San <san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.02; ocaml:01 storm:98 28,:98 2009:98 peng:98 peng:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 blue:96 jul:05 wich:05 tue:06 looks:08 looks:08 

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Peng Zang<peng.zang@gmail.com> wrote:
> That looks great.

I'm not sure. I actually prefer the old icon. On the old icon, the
caml looks like a cool guy (or animal), on this new icon it looks (in
my eyes) as a pretentious basard. I think the bigger glasses look
pretentious, and the spiky ears remove the cute factor (round ears ->
teddy bear).
Also I don't like the colors, wich are colder and grayer.

My two cents.