From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012347EE25 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:55:54 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.83.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.41 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.83.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ee0-f41.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.83.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="nicolas.braudsantoni@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ee0-f41.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQDABzsi1JKfVMplGdsb2JhbABZgz/AEYEiFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQVAARscAgMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHBMIAQGHagEDDwQBCKIqjFeDCYQlChknDWSHdhEBBQyPUhaEHAOQMIExhjGGP4liQYRU X-IPAS-Result: AkQDABzsi1JKfVMplGdsb2JhbABZgz/AEYEiFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQVAARscAgMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHBMIAQGHagEDDwQBCKIqjFeDCYQlChknDWSHdhEBBQyPUhaEHAOQMIExhjGGP4liQYRU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,732,1378850400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="43923595" Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 19 Nov 2013 23:55:47 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so2379125eei.28 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:55:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=8YAws0Az2RZLVFG6zdwM/c9rZxLfeTOB5mJZQ54WEqM=; b=a4LQAtHEL4s5h31EXnAY3gvR7ZtrZGkB0GZ19VCaPVfiewp/QdgQM0ppBzI/4uOHV7 HqDH3He8XO63rjYkMpUDoVEBRjsOic3nuzJTefG9zldVm/IJSOVxIcHLVybucBFqRzmN 4G+RhQ440+jWCEB2LHPeQlaUKEfWfZ6tomOKxhd8wKuU1pPver+sPIFX0nl/uhkntF// YCpLol8Zgbk7LnIcJI8h9zjbCabjjkNvGpEn7dsO67mfNjjkuc+3ifihYo0dgFNN5Qf7 Jgd+G74UIh8vcr1pB2D/wMMd47+8y3awEuo1zcVXZYqadzDfcwGnaYS8JrdXoqoMNxBy G2IQ== X-Received: by 10.15.49.195 with SMTP id j43mr22689873eew.40.1384901746659; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:55:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [193.170.224.192] (m-192.vc-graz.ac.at. [193.170.224.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm53351449eeg.0.2013.11.19.14.55.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:55:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <528BEC6B.4090300@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:55:39 +0100 From: Nicolas Braud-Santoni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20131118204426.GA14731@annexia.org> <1384819720.4083.57.camel@zotac> <1384859953.62343.YahooMailNeo@web120403.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20131119125519.GA18044@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> <528BE3C3.2050304@gmail.com> <20131119223932.GH10034@cooper-siegel.org> In-Reply-To: <20131119223932.GH10034@cooper-siegel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qp1OwTeeoKiikXg6PLrIUj7hrQJujXbWX" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Hardening [Perl's] hash function further This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qp1OwTeeoKiikXg6PLrIUj7hrQJujXbWX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/11/2013 23:39, Eric Cooper wrote: > But many systems-on-chips have crypto engines that can be used for > this purpose. See > http://www.marvell.com/application-processors/armada-500/ to cite just > one example.=20 Using SoC-specific hardware accelerators is probably way out-of-scope here :-) --qp1OwTeeoKiikXg6PLrIUj7hrQJujXbWX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSi+xvAAoJEPv4tP2UoeSecG0P/iKcThBo4DUX4Yo31leEFMxD 3PWdVBtkOmycC5rIVxJcofkIGaHgIWYY/qnaW05uZJyFSh9Xp+o/2wpBhn76vHgC hcBBxM+BlxLoQFYMUcA3hHZ4IlcnP1YjEMFY5Z8UftRCyUrnhF1BL9p4RyVkvEGU tiewcOb8Ez0ErzGI/9JeF/4rEozXHfFWrPx7uxfMVCF0J/8IA+WdmFky/cke6r2D PYXw7Fj8rNmu4YIvEk+Fk9AaqVa2hecL7keU8+gfOCIllI+T/jY6ufCT+hH6E2FC uu7cYcXSVRaOibS4wo32mQ7OtyFPUxuzgYs2CgnT5QvaP/fTR6GxZ5l+x5PvPoDg 8TZFdRxbvDq9bs5UGc5QRAJYLb9NGqdYj3eWG4RL3l2n8AQKYaQJLFpb4svsjMO5 oAMpDdrY26CgNEAUL8OzEwUQlM77jQYsVUlwAjCfqxAAWRrl/OxIPUMG67gC2nRX LwwlEmMQKZSS5ZjHSUX8hlNEfQDsMg/+hc7GVlQytW1vkhq2stLIKJAhGIhwXhYB mC3E+qGuFRLaLtJY/bw6Tv6HnuGMEVju0mkyOEYAo3S/x6/HU0oTdr3202AfuvnT EClQv8vQOFpXo8fQJi7IxJWxnlEKuKZHguGV85/JXVNNwUiD29XlBRC6dbSklpnm cQpQTj6R8x/IhRchtocz =Wdl4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qp1OwTeeoKiikXg6PLrIUj7hrQJujXbWX--