From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A79197F7C2 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 01:36:52 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of benjamin.canou@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.54; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="benjamin.canou@gmail.com"; x-sender="benjamin.canou@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of benjamin.canou@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.54; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="benjamin.canou@gmail.com"; x-sender="benjamin.canou@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wg0-f54.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.54; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="benjamin.canou@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f54.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsCAD4q9FJKfVI2lWdsb2JhbABZhxy7doEOFg4BAQEBBw0JCRIqgiUBAQUjDwEFCAEbFAQEAQEDDAYFCw0CAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBEREBBQEcBg0BBwKHbAEDEQQBoAuMC1ODDpNkChknDWSIBhEBBQyBHY1RB4JvgUkBA5grhkiJbEGEWg X-IPAS-Result: ApsCAD4q9FJKfVI2lWdsb2JhbABZhxy7doEOFg4BAQEBBw0JCRIqgiUBAQUjDwEFCAEbFAQEAQEDDAYFCw0CAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBEREBBQEcBg0BBwKHbAEDEQQBoAuMC1ODDpNkChknDWSIBhEBBQyBHY1RB4JvgUkBA5grhkiJbEGEWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,796,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="48097749" Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Feb 2014 01:36:52 +0100 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so1792514wgg.21 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:36:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IikVcU86OJ+1QgioPHXoUgZwfwPAJRdSBZ8wYmdFybk=; b=cU47F5arqwPb7V4L4rxSRAx+7HuTelyolaTRaKhpBa0znQwi8kHGzFyXxr419pzyTU +1nMouNTcT2+8zfJxMW5xHzvZ7LVvfHk6wNuZ1n9ToZHO97uXac/aL2nLl9f07Q5nzQN 6l0AtXApKjEY5I04xiQK2AfUXl8ncmctlDUCrXdq4ySX0Axb1iPiZ1RwhgI9ZErDrB6v lYuCYUZxj+huSVfCb9Vpn9aNvWfkiZoQk0kXD2SDJWHUe910pt247IiV5vMp2EMnR3cz ypt41O+bVJgXmKvnorDiG+NwtS8/LRSv4bKlAJd3rbrIbYJ/ppfDxC2zuXAYAOOb4A6Z BzGg== X-Received: by 10.194.57.239 with SMTP id l15mr8210749wjq.40.1391733411773; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.48] (ivr94-9-88-170-234-119.fbx.proxad.net. [88.170.234.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm3sm3168819wib.8.2014.02.06.16.36.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:36:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F438AC.2080600@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 02:36:44 +0100 From: Benjamin Canou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIELDvG56bGk=?= CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <52F35934.5070306@inria.fr> <52F3728A.1010408@gmail.com> <4EE76A0DCE894248BA68BF2D57EBE595@erratique.ch> <52F3B33E.9040000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52F3B33E.9040000@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlPro Highlights: Dec 2013 & Jan 2014 Dear all, It seems that my faux olde english is quite poor, and that my message reads as an angry attack at Daniel for some people. Of course it is not, and Daniel, I apologize if you took it this way too. I'll treat you to a pint next time we see each other. I just wanted to react to your quite justified criticism, but since I found your tone a bit harsh, I chose to reply with a bad joke tone in return. My not so good english and the e-mail medium seem to have betrayed me. So to clarify things, this is not a release announce, I thought that the 0.1 version number would make it clear, but here again, my mistake. Of course, the proper release will include a documented interface. But for now, there is no well documented public interface yet, on purpose. The library is not frozen because it is still in design stage, and I am not sure where to place the abstraction barrier, so I don't want anyone to take an interface as granted. I made an early distribution so that my blog entry could be backed by something tangible and to collect potential users and remarks, as the ones of Romain. In this context, I just gave a hint to Romain as how he could hack a bit, in absence of the mlis he was searching for. Benjamin. On 06/02/2014 17:07, Benjamin Canou wrote: > Le 06/02/2014 14:06, Daniel Bünzli a écrit : >> As soon as I see a lack of mli files in a published package, I >> disregard. I equate it with lack of design. > Well, I'm very, very sorry that I disappointed you, my lord. > But do not be worried, I shall compose an mli when comes the time, for > I would cherish your blessing upon my modest package. > > Cheers, > > Benjamin.