From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4937F7B4 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:39:46 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=pra; client-ip=193.252.23.215; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.252.23.215; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=193.252.23.215; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0BAGjj+FLB/BfXnGdsb2JhbAA/GoNEwBSBJg4BAQEBAQgLCQkUKIImAQU4QAEQCw4TFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcBAYgFCTbJDxeOOEUHhDgElEKDaYEyhRaPBw X-IPAS-Result: Ar0BAGjj+FLB/BfXnGdsb2JhbAA/GoNEwBSBJg4BAQEBAQgLCQkUKIImAQU4QAEQCw4TFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcBAYgFCTbJDxeOOEUHhDgElEKDaYEyhRaPBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,818,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="57705629" Received: from msa06.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.215]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2014 15:39:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.133] ([92.151.124.253]) by mwinf5d46 with ME id Qefl1n0045U8taL03efl0e; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:39:45 +0100 Message-ID: <52F8E4B4.3090704@frisch.fr> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:39:48 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Millwood , Goswin von Brederlow CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20140206105811.GD28534@frosties> <20140210084746.GB26593@frosties> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Proposal: extend try to handle success Other people seem to prefer a syntax which would allow (maybe in the future) sharing exceptional and non-exceptional cases in the same clause. In order to keep the discussion in one place, could you (Goswin and Ben, in particular) summarize your proposal on the corresponding Mantis ticket? http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=6318 Thanks! Alain