From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D147EF5E
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:v4/MNxxg18VQPPjXCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0eITIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtSDra4YwLeN+4nbGkU4qa6bt34DdJEeHzQksu4x2zIaPcieFEfgJ+TrZSFpVO5LVVti4m3peRMNQJW2WVTerzWI4CIIHV2nbEwud7yzRtKZ0p///tvx0qWbWx9Piju5bOE6BzSNhiKViPMrh5B/IL060BrDrygAUe1XwWR1OQDbxE6ktY+YtaRu+CVIuv8n69UIEeCjJ/x5HvRkC2EdMmUy4oXArwTKSwaUri8HU2ARlFxDGRXM6hzhGM2p6nTSs7Ztni6AMpulY6ozXGGO5r1qT1fUhSYXOj8j+SmDhsVqjaUdvB+gtxF+2Yf8ZoWYJeZzeOXWetZMFjkJZdpYSyEUWtD0VIAIFedUeL8A94Q=
Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@relay2-d.mail.gandi.net
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=217.70.183.194;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=217.70.183.194;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@relay2-d.mail.gandi.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=217.70.183.194;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@relay2-d.mail.gandi.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DSAADl5YhXh8K3RtlchRa6aIYaAoEsPBABAQEBAQEBAREBAQEIDQkJIS+CMgQBEgGCEwEEATgCPwULBAdGVwYbEogODMAGAQEBBwEBAQEjhiqETYobBZkhgV6MdoFcjWCQGQI1gjuBWIZBfwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A0DSAADl5YhXh8K3RtlchRa6aIYaAoEsPBABAQEBAQEBAREBAQEIDQkJIS+CMgQBEgGCEwEEATgCPwULBAdGVwYbEogODMAGAQEBBwEBAQEjhiqETYobBZkhgV6MdoFcjWCQGQI1gjuBWIZBfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,368,1464645600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="184919301"
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2016 15:36:10 +0200
Received: from mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.142])
	by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680FEC5A6A;
	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:36:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter14-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.194])
	by mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id W1Zf_KkbVsfL; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:36:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.141
Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail1-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.141])
	(Authenticated sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com)
	by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D1252C5A55;
	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:36:07 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:36:07 +0100
From: Dario Teixeira <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com>
To: Simon Cruanes <simon.cruanes.2007@m4x.org>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20160715112035.GA947@fuck_yeah.lan>
References: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com>
 <20160715112035.GA947@fuck_yeah.lan>
Message-ID: <5326bd833a3362ef6b7248aca94df3f1@nleyten.com>
X-Sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ZeroMQ vs Nanomsg

Hi,

> I didn't know development of nanomsg had resumed, but it's good news. I
> use rgrinberg's onanomsg binding, which works fine for me (although 
> it's
> only for a small program), no memleaks, and the API is nice. I think 
> the
> bindings are quite mature and rgrinberg is very nice to interact with
> ;-).

Thanks for the feedback!  That's good to hear, as I'm currently leaning
more towards Nanomsg.  Do you also have any positive/negative experience
with ZeroMQ?

Cheers,
Dario