* [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
@ 2019-04-25 2:52 Андрей Бергман
2019-04-25 3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Андрей Бергман @ 2019-04-25 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml users
Hello,
what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
Sincerely,
Andrey.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
2019-04-25 2:52 [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx Андрей Бергман
@ 2019-04-25 3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-29 10:42 ` Jeremie Dimino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Boom @ 2019-04-25 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at
least GPL-compatible.
-- hendrik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
2019-04-25 3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
@ 2019-04-29 10:42 ` Jeremie Dimino
2019-04-29 23:56 ` Hendrik Boom
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremie Dimino @ 2019-04-29 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hendrik Boom; +Cc: caml users
We are using MIT for all the ppx rewriters released by Jane Street.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:21 AM Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
>
> Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at
> least GPL-compatible.
>
> -- hendrik
--
Jeremie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
2019-04-29 10:42 ` Jeremie Dimino
@ 2019-04-29 23:56 ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-30 0:39 ` Андрей Бергман
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Boom @ 2019-04-29 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:42:28AM +0100, Jeremie Dimino wrote:
> We are using MIT for all the ppx rewriters released by Jane Street.
That seems sufficient.
-- hendrik
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:21 AM Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
> >
> > Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at
> > least GPL-compatible.
> >
> > -- hendrik
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
2019-04-29 23:56 ` Hendrik Boom
@ 2019-04-30 0:39 ` Андрей Бергман
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Андрей Бергман @ 2019-04-30 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hendrik Boom; +Cc: caml-list
Thanks a lot, Hendrik and Jeremie!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-30 0:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-25 2:52 [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx Андрей Бергман
2019-04-25 3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-29 10:42 ` Jeremie Dimino
2019-04-29 23:56 ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-30 0:39 ` Андрей Бергман
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).