From: Norman Hardy <norm@cap-lore.com>
To: Jacques Le Normand <rathereasy@gmail.com>
Cc: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@janestreet.com>,
Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>,
Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>,
Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>,
Roberto Di Cosmo <roberto@dicosmo.org>,
Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>,
OCaML List Mailing <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Equality between abstract type definitions
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:08:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD8CDF-0FB3-463A-B2DA-077488CEDC71@cap-lore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK0y-374OxDt-4SLMrFtuHJGxy8z0o41BAp64oPFrHVbmXL1TQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 468 bytes --]
On 2013 Oct 25, at 13:44 , Jacques Le Normand <rathereasy@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm surprised noone has pointed out the new type annotation syntax:
>
> let id : type s. s -> s = fun x -> x
>
I like that syntax, I think.
I suppose that "id : type s. s -> s = fun x -> x" is a let-binding
and that "id : type s. s -> s" is a pattern,
but I cannot get the syntax at http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/patterns.html
to produce "id : type s. s -> s”.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1426 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-26 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 22:57 Peter Frey
2013-10-24 23:23 ` Jacques Garrigue
2013-10-25 6:44 ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-25 8:29 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25 9:59 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2013-10-25 11:09 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-25 14:24 ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-25 20:32 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-25 20:44 ` Jacques Le Normand
2013-10-26 1:08 ` Norman Hardy [this message]
2013-10-26 5:28 ` Jacques Garrigue
2013-10-27 12:16 ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-27 12:56 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-27 14:28 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-27 14:43 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-27 15:25 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-27 15:41 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-25 12:35 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25 12:45 ` Jonathan Protzenko
2013-10-25 13:20 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25 14:03 ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-26 9:07 ` oleg
2013-10-26 14:11 ` Didier Remy
2013-10-26 17:32 ` Didier Remy
2013-10-27 12:07 ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-27 14:10 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-28 3:30 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FD8CDF-0FB3-463A-B2DA-077488CEDC71@cap-lore.com \
--to=norm@cap-lore.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
--cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=ivg@ieee.org \
--cc=rathereasy@gmail.com \
--cc=roberto@dicosmo.org \
--cc=rossberg@mpi-sws.org \
--cc=yminsky@janestreet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).