From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vb@luminar.eu.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6410F7FACF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:55:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  vb@luminar.eu.org) identity=pra; client-ip=94.23.24.152;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="vb@luminar.eu.org";
  x-sender="vb@luminar.eu.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  vb@luminar.eu.org designates 94.23.24.152 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=94.23.24.152;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="vb@luminar.eu.org";
  x-sender="vb@luminar.eu.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@luminar.eu.org designates 94.23.24.152 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=94.23.24.152;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="vb@luminar.eu.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@luminar.eu.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAGfR/lNeFxiY/2dsb2JhbABbgmojhCbNXYMgAYEYFneEBAEFI1UBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwBBwEBiD8DqlqUOheBLI1eQgeCeYFTAQSPG4IUoEODYIFygUcBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: AgcFAGfR/lNeFxiY/2dsb2JhbABbgmojhCbNXYMgAYEYFneEBAEFI1UBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwBBwEBiD8DqlqUOheBLI1eQgeCeYFTAQSPG4IUoEODYIFygUcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,416,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="76921555"
Received: from luminar.eu.org ([94.23.24.152])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 28 Aug 2014 08:55:07 +0200
Received: from [IPv6:2001:41d0:fc9c:c500:48e8:d311:dad1:73fd] (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:fc9c:c500:48e8:d311:dad1:73fd])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by luminar.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12FD660A41;
	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:55:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53FED248.1070505@luminar.eu.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:55:04 +0200
From: "Vincent B." <vb@luminar.eu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>, 
 Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>
CC: =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIELDvG56bGk=?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>, 
 OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
References: <CAFrFfuHqMWZYWmKCCLHgVO2wHctw4ULyMBOCn-Hu-63PuzX_tg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFrFfuFrEcbCAovYXqBdrWL936roo_AQ7fBkwCkiq2jpNLfQzQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFrFfuH=a66jGPskNhJ4LeoRvgzRrQQP+zc8yM5GJOJk-A76-A@mail.gmail.com>	<104D94B9C9544BA1823C6F27B8CBF90D@erratique.ch>	<CAFrFfuGona6BvUDF+eA55C-J1bXyrWVxzMAF4k6YhW+WO7V9eQ@mail.gmail.com>	<B6BAC2E3-B53B-4F30-9C2D-C097919861CE@recoil.org> <CAFrFfuFJhjc5urJ-CLniNHx14MdtWuuh2sr6+hQDtMP-OkKYTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFrFfuFJhjc5urJ-CLniNHx14MdtWuuh2sr6+hQDtMP-OkKYTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is this an opam bug or something i'm doing wrong?

On 28/08/2014 01:02, Martin DeMello wrote:
> I managed to fix it by uninstalling opam-git and installing opam; the bug seems
> to be that while the opam-git package did update to 1.1 it never triggered an
> update to my installation.
> 
> martin 
> 

Hi Martin,

On Archlinux git packages are not upgraded on a package upgrade, there is no way
AFAIK for the package manager to guess if a git package has been upgraded or not.

So this is normal.

I recommand using only the "opam-git" package on Archlinux until a new OPAM
version is released.

Cheers,

Vincent