caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Baelde" <david.baelde@gmail.com>
To: Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: OO design
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:35:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53c655920605050235k64e70333je8df813239ea3c53@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I'm no OO guru, so my question may be irrelevant, or there just might
not be an answer, which wouldn't hurt..

Let's say that I have a base class, with some kind of activation
procedure: anybody wanting to use the class must call #enter before,
and then call #leave for releasing. Internally, the methods #do_enter
and #do_leave are called respectively at the first #enter and last
#leave.

Nobody should call the #do_* directly, and I'd also like to make sure
the #enter and #leave are never overriden, since their behaviour is
important and actually much more complex than what I said.

I could just rely on the user who derives my base class, but let's see
what we can do. First the #do_* should be made private, so they can be
defined in the derived classes, but never called from the outside. To
avoid the overriding of #enter and #leave the only solution seems to
make them normal functions instead of methods. But then how could
#enter call #do_enter ? I tried to first define the class with public
#enter and make that method private in the interface, but OCaml told
me that was impossible.

I'm just curious if anybody has an opinion/idea about that.
--
David


             reply	other threads:[~2006-05-05  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-05  9:35 David Baelde [this message]
2006-05-05 10:47 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2006-05-05 13:00 ` Remi Vanicat
2006-05-05 19:32   ` Andrej Bauer
2006-05-08  3:17 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-05-08 21:29   ` David Teller
2006-05-08 21:36     ` Dan Grossman
2006-05-10  2:41       ` Geoffrey Alan Washburn
2006-05-10 16:17         ` [Caml-list] " Dan Grossman
2006-05-10 18:15           ` Geoffrey Alan Washburn
2006-05-10 18:44             ` [Caml-list] " Dan Grossman
2006-05-10 18:35           ` Shawn
2006-05-10 18:47             ` Till Varoquaux
2006-05-10 19:01               ` Shawn
2006-05-10 18:43           ` brogoff
2006-05-11  0:08             ` Geoffrey Alan Washburn
2006-05-11  5:45               ` [Caml-list] " Till Varoquaux
2006-05-11  6:21               ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-05-11 15:48                 ` Geoffrey Alan Washburn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53c655920605050235k64e70333je8df813239ea3c53@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.baelde@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=david.baelde@ens-lyon.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).