From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F917FACC for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:08 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.17.12; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.17.12; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mout.web.de) identity=helo; client-ip=212.227.17.12; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mout.web.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUBALAREFTU4xEMnGdsb2JhbABZg2CDU8cwiFgWEAEBAQEBBg0JCRQqhC1VNgIFFgsCCwMCAQIBWAgBAYhCCZhhjzSBbZNEBIEsjj6CY4FTAQSVcYcChykTBZFQgzkBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AtUBALAREFTU4xEMnGdsb2JhbABZg2CDU8cwiFgWEAEBAQEBBg0JCRQqhC1VNgIFFgsCCwMCAQIBWAgBAYhCCZhhjzSBbZNEBIEsjj6CY4FTAQSVcYcChykTBZFQgzkBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,497,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="78413281" Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Sep 2014 10:56:07 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.215] ([78.49.106.153]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1X9B-1YL7xm1NIP-00tVdz for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <54101221.3010304@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:01 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x+g1Df8n7vUzkkQmJJntXc4lBU+q43YdSnI5p6gBfTevqkcdKgX pZbZn6Z0C/FDRbT0whv8pTwfos/7+q9YhB1NcHXJXoqXEIkpVoHjdHY2e/pCpA/ewR2vxtB H+pxxrcA+kBNBHSH9sOj34c/MrrLQ2DiPvzKzwGA8d2LW2DxFYAA6G+gnzNeN1CmoK8xixP +pUJ69PwxYKHnK25Lz3bQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: [Caml-list] Clarification for the configuration of comparison functions Hello, I extended my software development experience a bit for the programming language "OCaml". I find my knowledge incomplete here to resolve an issue like "Comparison function application" alone. https://github.com/elfring/OTCL/issues/4 How do you think about to discuss corresponding implementation details for an evolving class library? I would appreciate your advices. Regards, Markus