From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398027F75C for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.17.11; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.17.11; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mout.web.de) identity=helo; client-ip=212.227.17.11; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mout.web.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoBAM9dEVTU4xELnGdsb2JhbABg1DYBgQoWEAEBAQEBBg0JCRQqhAQBAQMBHVsBEAshFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiDYMrAuTZgEXj00HhEwBBJx8hysTBZFZgzkBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AkoBAM9dEVTU4xELnGdsb2JhbABg1DYBgQoWEAEBAQEBBg0JCRQqhAQBAQMBHVsBEAshFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiDYMrAuTZgEXj00HhEwBBJx8hysTBZFZgzkBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,504,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="94094009" Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2014 10:33:30 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.215] ([78.49.18.115]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNcV4-1XQJms0qkc-007EDE; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <54115E56.5080208@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:33:26 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francois Berenger CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <54101221.3010304@users.sourceforge.net> <1410348425.3003.11.camel@thinkpad> <5410BB11.2070406@users.sourceforge.net> <5411533C.6060802@inria.fr> <5411590D.2050508@users.sourceforge.net> <54115C33.4050408@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <54115C33.4050408@inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BMyI+IzeQCLrYyqnI37/PQwo3/zCmlULbD3OJ0E2tqzU9ANd/Cy fpyJh9e5FCwe4ByvVpUTiCKPUzeHMUqrVGx/JG7/sdNOe96scRsGSfu6tu40Es2Xg5Kf2pA x14X9Lcjnd8ccqD66RbhnsE8kq37/nGpZFAHOu2Lr/Twoemann1guPu7PIzr63pi5OgDXKy FhKi97TXKsaYeWS0AxjxQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Clarification for the configuration of comparison functions >> Should the shown function name be replaced by a call for "~cmp"? > > Probably, but I am also not familiar with this code base. Can any other OCaml software designer give a definitive advice here besides the original developers? Regards, Markus