From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C571B7FACD
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:14:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.125.82.41;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com";
  x-sender="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com designates
  74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.125.82.41;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com";
  x-sender="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wg0-f41.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.125.82.41;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f41.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQIAEwPHFRKfVIplGdsb2JhbABgghYEgh3OBYMkCgGBARYBEQEBAQEHCwsJEiyEBAEBBBIgAQ0BGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHAYNAQcCHogHAQMRBAGgGmuNIoMQiTAKGScNZoZIAREBBQ6PaQeESwEEnQyHSYwNQYUQa4JKAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: AvQIAEwPHFRKfVIplGdsb2JhbABgghYEgh3OBYMkCgGBARYBEQEBAQEHCwsJEiyEBAEBBBIgAQ0BGxwBAQMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHAYNAQcCHogHAQMRBAGgGmuNIoMQiTAKGScNZoZIAREBBQ6PaQeESwEEnQyHSYwNQYUQa4JKAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,554,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="96618167"
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 19 Sep 2014 13:14:03 +0200
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a1so119805wgh.12
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ai6r5jrceHO4YfQSnERMziZx7L7ICIHS2bYWjzepqac=;
        b=GMjVmUKkmi8H4PZDuBr6ei7dru8iAOZEjmYp1QL5SY0affZa9Z3OMu802mgeadYJVD
         OEdtZpIys6QKxEzqEECgVqFj5NAQrSIEi912i1/i/W+lVMkPcaS9Y6VI0FdLrpLsAlfr
         zDrrulunTSnF6Re/5ZLEszfVFY73vFh9OI9THC6Cw+ZdIEcb0TVcrO0ZG7T83hy3t2Px
         kFkhNMhsonnTNVwG/hrxaNQhtFGGPuq/CpgrXfxIzceqJH19w/66sVK7Sbx72oXHdc22
         ifBv6s9bcF5LhuHQJWczj4LykLNJsx9+dmiNEgfYEMJEg1pr0grxvcHlLywSu6eF0mYP
         BbXQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.183.163 with SMTP id en3mr47474432wic.36.1411125243293;
        Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.27.6.185] ([213.106.240.92])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm1604864wjf.13.2014.09.19.04.14.02
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <541C1050.8090202@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:15:28 +0100
From: Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Drup <drupyog+caml@zoho.com>
CC: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <CAN6ygO=P_QTa6Wk0=Wx=0XLwhGOP=16eGaGiacA5N60nRjApDQ@mail.gmail.com>	<5410522E.3050207@inria.fr> <20140910161744.5a7eecd0@alcazar2> <5410A2F5.4070107@zoho.com>
In-Reply-To: <5410A2F5.4070107@zoho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] One build system to rule them all?

On 10/09/14 20:13, Drup wrote:
> Le 10/09/2014 16:17, Maxence Guesdon a écrit :
>> I can't resist to add good old Make to the list, not specific to OCaml,
>> yet powerful enough and known by a lot of developers.
>>
> No.
> Every single makefile to compile ocaml (except OCaml-makefile[1]) I have encountered are broken. Every single one of them. OCaml compilation process is too complex to be able to fire some rules and be
> done with it; especially if you want portability.
> 
> Please, don't write makefiles.

Non sequitur.