From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0CF7F75C for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=pra; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of alain@frisch.fr) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=193.252.23.213; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIBAM5NIVTB/BfVnGdsb2JhbABghznKeIMgAYEmAREBAQEBAQgLCQkUK4QEAQEEIxVAARALDgoCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAYg+ri+WOgEXgSyOA1gHgniBUwEEnRWHTI9zG4FbgXCBRAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AqIBAM5NIVTB/BfVnGdsb2JhbABghznKeIMgAYEmAREBAQEBAQgLCQkUK4QEAQEEIxVAARALDgoCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAYg+ri+WOgEXgSyOA1gHgniBUwEEnRWHTI9zG4FbgXCBRAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,579,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="97414698" Received: from msa04.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.213]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2014 12:40:30 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.132] ([92.151.92.168]) by mwinf5d30 with ME id uagU1o00A3dx2K803agUSF; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:40:29 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.132] X-ME-Auth: bGV4aWZpQHdhbmFkb28uZnI= X-ME-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:40:29 +0200 X-ME-IP: 92.151.92.168 Message-ID: <54214E1C.4010507@frisch.fr> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:40:28 +0200 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yaron Minsky CC: Gerd Stolpmann , Bob Zhang , Caml List References: <541C2037.5030303@frisch.fr> <1411133763.2930.28.camel@zotac> <541C36FF.3010603@frisch.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] improve omake [was One build system to rule them all] On 09/19/2014 05:18 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote: > - The build itself has limited parallelism because of various > bottlenecks inside omake, like the fact that it computes its md5sums > in a single process. I think that omake doesn't usually recompute the md5 when the file hasn't changed (probably based on the mtime, maybe inode as well), so I'm surprised by the claim. Did you actually confirm that the computation of md5 was one of the bottlenecks or is it just an hypothesis? -- Alain