Re: [Caml-list] OPAM 1.2.1

["Mr. Herr" <misterherr@freenet.de>]

On 27.03.2015 19:09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de> wrote:
>>
>> the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/1.2.1, as well as the compile result of
>> opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.3.1.
>>
>> All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 version.
>>
>> Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-x86_64-Linux
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update
>>
>> =-=- Updating package repositories =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> [default] synchronized from https://opam.ocaml.org
>>
>> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
>> ===== ↻  1   ↗  1 =====
>> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux update
>> [default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt
>> Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ...
>> Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ...
>> Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ...
>> Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ...
>>
>> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
>> === 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade ===
>> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> What can I do to debug this?
>>
> I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't specified what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam update" twice.
>
> Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and upgrades them), or "opam update && opam upgrade".
>
>
the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is what I have come to 
expect.

The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyphs - very dubious.

/Str