From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2FA7FCCB for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:54:42 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of misterherr@freenet.de) identity=pra; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of misterherr@freenet.de) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mout3.freenet.de) identity=helo; client-ip=195.4.92.93; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="misterherr@freenet.de"; x-sender="postmaster@mout3.freenet.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CUAACAtBVVm11cBMNcgmR0WoMTsiyQEoV1AoE6TAEBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULoQUAQEBAwEjSwoRCQIYCQQSCAMCAgkDAgECATMBEQYNBgIBAQ6ICAEDCQkDAQiVS5x2lAQJQQMJYgGEXwEBAQcBAQEBHosohDZJgmiBRQWFDQqBA4o9g2+HHDqFLQOGNYMvg0iCJByBUW4BgQOBPwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0CUAACAtBVVm11cBMNcgmR0WoMTsiyQEoV1AoE6TAEBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULoQUAQEBAwEjSwoRCQIYCQQSCAMCAgkDAgECATMBEQYNBgIBAQ6ICAEDCQkDAQiVS5x2lAQJQQMJYgGEXwEBAQcBAQEBHosohDZJgmiBRQWFDQqBA4o9g2+HHDqFLQOGNYMvg0iCJByBUW4BgQOBPwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,480,1422918000"; d="scan'208,217";a="107429772" Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Mar 2015 20:54:41 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YbaL3-0000w2-7R for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:54:41 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:35151 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YbaL3-00071G-34 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:54:41 +0100 Received: from mx13.freenet.de ([195.4.92.23]:33333) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YbaIs-0005aB-8Y for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:52:26 +0100 Received: from cl-252.ham-02.de.sixxs.net ([2001:6f8:1c00:fb::2]:47645) by mx13.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID misterherr@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (port 465) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YbaIr-0003Zk-TJ for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:52:26 +0100 Message-ID: <5515B4F8.3070205@freenet.de> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:52:24 +0100 From: "Mr. Herr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Caml List References: <2162350.aHZvdojE6Q@agaric> <55159AD3.7050507@freenet.de> <5515A183.3020709@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060101060502070601060409" X-Originated-At: 2001:6f8:1c00:fb::2!47645 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM 1.2.1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060101060502070601060409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hm, top-posting? Okay, so we have hieroglyph graphics in 1.2.1, and the update of the local = opam=20 directories is terse , and everything is fine. I would have voted against the unicode graphics, they are not enough self e= xplaining=20 (I admit though using =E2=9C=93 in my scripts). While we are at it: opam has become a well working, very reliable package m= anager on=20 *nix systems, thank you. /Str. On 27.03.2015 19:54, Ashish Agarwal wrote: > There is no error. The update seems to have succeeded. An "update" only u= pdates the=20 > metadata information, and doesn't actually upgrade any of your packages. = To upgrade=20 > your packages, you can now type "opam upgrade" as the message printed out= states. never with dubious binaries... :-) > > What you're referring to as heiroglyphs, I see as rather nice usage of un= icode=20 > characters to represent useful information. > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Mr. Herr > wrote: > > > > On 27.03.2015 19 :09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr > wrote: > > > the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/= tag/1.2.1, > as well as the compile result of > opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.= 3.1. > > All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 ve= rsion. > > Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-= x86_64-Linux > > -------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------- > strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update > > =3D-=3D- Updating package repositories > =3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-= =3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D > [default] synchronized from https://opam.ocaml.org > > Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade': > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =E2=86=BB 1 =E2=86=97 1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux upda= te > [default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt > Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ... > Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ... > Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ... > Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ... > > Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade': > =3D=3D=3D 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade =3D=3D=3D > strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> > -------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------- > > What can I do to debug this? > > I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't = specified > what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam = update" twice. > > Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and up= grades > them), or "opam update && opam upgrade". > > > the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is wha= t I have > come to expect. > > The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyph= s - very > dubious. > > /Str > > > > --=20 > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > --------------060101060502070601060409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hm, top-posting?

Okay, so we have hieroglyph graphics in 1.2.1, and the update of the local opam directories is terse , and everything is fine.

I would have voted against the unicode graphics, they are not enough self explaining (I admit though using =E2=9C=93 in my scripts).

While we are at it: opam has become a well working, very reliable package manager on *nix systems, thank you.

/Str.

On 27.03.2015 19:54, Ashish Agarwal wrote:
There is no error. The update seems to have succeeded. An "update" only updates the metadata information, and doesn't actually upgrade any of your packages. To upgrade your packages, you can now type "opam upgrade" as the message printed out states.
never with dubious binaries... :-)

What you're referring to as heiroglyphs, I see as rather nice usage of unicode characters to represent useful information.


On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Mr. Herr <miste= rherr@freenet.de> wrote:


On 27.03.2015 19:09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de> wrote:

the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/relea= ses/tag/1.2.1, as well as the compile result of
opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.3.1.

All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 version.

Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-x86_64-Linux

-------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update

=3D-=3D- Updating package repositories =3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D= -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D
[default] synchronized from htt= ps://opam.ocaml.org

Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =E2=86=BB=C2=A0 1=C2=A0 =C2=A0=E2=86=97= =C2=A0 1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux update
[default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt=
Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ...
Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ...
Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ...
Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ...

Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
=3D=3D=3D 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade =3D=3D=3D
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol>
-------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------------

What can I do to debug this?

I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't specified what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam update" twice.

Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and upgrades them), or "opam update && opam upgrade".


the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is what I have come to expect.

The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyphs - very dubious.

/Str



--
Caml-list mailing list.=C2=A0 Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-l= ist
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beg= inners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs<= /div>


--------------060101060502070601060409--