From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F1F7EE49
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:30:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYBAFy1OlJKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABbgz+De74EgTgOAQEBAQEGDQkJFCiCJgEBBAECIFYQCxoCJgICKB8QBhuHewQIpzuSIQSBKY4LMweCaTWBAAOVMYhoFI5q
X-IPAS-Result: AnYBAFy1OlJKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABbgz+De74EgTgOAQEBAQEGDQkJFCiCJgEBBAECIFYQCxoCJgICKB8QBhuHewQIpzuSIQSBKY4LMweCaTWBAAOVMYhoFI5q
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,935,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="27363467"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2013 10:30:06 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.24] (110-19.193-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.193.19.110])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3112203C6E;
	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:30:56 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
Cc: Gour <gour@atmarama.net>, caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <560D4746649B40B9A0008658FAC292C5@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <523AB1C7.1050509@frisch.fr>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <20130911073854.GA4499@kerneis.info>
 <20130911102024.6a311672@atmarama.noip.me>
 <1378899769.11824.15.camel@thinkpad>
 <20130918134229.37a0df52@atmarama.noip.me> <523AB1C7.1050509@frisch.fr>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

Le jeudi, 19 septembre 2013 =C3=A0 10:11, Alain Frisch a =C3=A9crit :
> - The lack of weak hash tables, which we use quite a lot. I wonder if
> Firefox's experimental WeakMap could be used to simulate them (and if=20=
=20
> other browsers will get similar features).

AFAIK, the answer is no. I explain why in this message [1].

Best,

Daniel

[1] https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/cl-mirage/2013-April/msg00032.html