From: Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Automated Instrumentation for Profiling
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:04:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E0C88.2030903@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7rcp8v471ade1JTU5AZC=JP6kx3nSsA_aAEAdbsVt7e0-uGw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/14/2015 09:59 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:
> Actually, I asked that question a bit prematurely, but any answers to
> number 2 are still welcome-I'd like to know about any and all options.
Personally, I used the Linux perf tools in the past.
I like them because they don't force you to recompile your software.
perf record [program invocation] # to profile your program
perf report -g # to read the report
> For the record, for number 1, you can get the associated profiling with
> a vanilla ocamlbuild/oasis setup without any hairy plugin by doing:
> ocaml setup.ml <http://setup.ml> <options options options> -tag profile
>
> From there, just executing your program like normal will have it poop
> out a little gmon.out that you can work with with gprof. As far as how
> good it is, it's as good as gprof/gmon because that's what it is behind
> the scenes.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller
> <kennethadammiller@gmail.com <mailto:kennethadammiller@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So, I'm looking to do some performance profiling of some libraries
> and tools. I would like some tools that are more language
> facilitated than an alternative of using something like oprofile
> because while oprofile is good, you can only guess at what is
> consuming the most time in your actual ocaml source because all the
> function names have been lost by that time.
>
> I found ocamlviz, and that seems pretty good, but I'm looking for
> something else because we plan to move away from using camlp4 toward
> ppx. Introducing this will mean an additional hurdle to overcome
> once the transition is complete in terms of customizing the build
> chain twice.
>
> In any case, I guess what I'd really like to know is:
>
> 1) How good are the ocamlcp and ocamloptp tools and how would you
> get a vanilla oasis/ocamlbuild combo to easily start using them instead?
>
> 2) Are there any ppx based profiling tools out there? I need both
> memory and time profiling to be done. OCamlviz was great because it
> had a graph-I don't necessarily need a dedicated gui, but some way
> to visualize the data would be very helpful.
>
>
--
Regards,
Francois.
"When in doubt, use more types"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 7:44 Kenneth Adam Miller
2015-10-14 7:59 ` Kenneth Adam Miller
2015-10-14 8:04 ` Francois Berenger [this message]
2015-10-14 8:11 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-10-14 8:25 ` Kenneth Adam Miller
2015-10-14 8:33 ` Kenneth Adam Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561E0C88.2030903@inria.fr \
--to=francois.berenger@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).