From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <francois.berenger@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332BF7F0F9
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:12:16 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,342,1444687200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="155085892"
Received: from meleze.ens.fr (HELO [129.199.99.114]) ([129.199.99.114])
  by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 25 Nov 2015 14:12:15 +0100
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <5655AE66.6000307@coherentgraphics.co.uk>
From: Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <5655B3AE.70402@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:12:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5655AE66.6000307@coherentgraphics.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Do you use a debugger with OCaml? If not, why not?

On 11/25/2015 01:49 PM, John Whitington wrote:
 > [...] How does your
> debugging process differ when writing OCaml compared with other
> languages you use?

In my experience, you fire the debugger much less often.

And when you do need to fire it once, you realize that
ocamldebug can back step ! :)

-- 
Regards,
Francois.
"When in doubt, use more types"