From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EE77FDE2 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:10:10 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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 Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=mehdi@dogguy.org; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=mehdi@dogguy.org; spf=Pass smtp.helo=postmaster@dogguy.org Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mehdi@dogguy.org) identity=pra; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of mehdi@dogguy.org designates 46.105.39.113 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@dogguy.org designates 46.105.39.113 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="postmaster@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AfBwDJpJ5W/3EnaS5egzpkW4hWtGCGDwIIgT08EAEBAQEBAQEBgQlBEgGBWYIIAQEEMgENAQE2Ag8LEgYJFg8JAwIBAgE3DgYBDAgCiBuvPoUpAQSLHAEBAQcCARcGiy6EK4EKg3yXH41fYH6ERIMIhVeOXDkrggSCBnGESVqBSwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0AfBwDJpJ5W/3EnaS5egzpkW4hWtGCGDwIIgT08EAEBAQEBAQEBgQlBEgGBWYIIAQEEMgENAQE2Ag8LEgYJFg8JAwIBAgE3DgYBDAgCiBuvPoUpAQSLHAEBAQcCARcGiy6EK4EKg3yXH41fYH6ERIMIhVeOXDkrggSCBnGESVqBSwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,319,1449529200"; d="scan'208";a="160931864" Received: from dogguy.org ([46.105.39.113]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2016 22:10:09 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.15] (89-158-41-87.rev.numericable.fr [89.158.41.87]) by dogguy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12E4E201C5; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:10:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dogguy.org; s=mail; t=1453237808; bh=yOAxBrgjavCwwwyaJGyYZZiTSR9NiZTB67/E3933qr8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gVeP0wrHml1YhUFMmQ+JbAhF89QG9e6wtkyCgqcwsn+yo8nnxWmUdDn4IdsdDkxso O6SdV7tjBlDqP94LFKgMMIS2mwH7ot6gF6tlL2An9z/J6NNpEbIQWnwKZnCB3D1aaq 1rwpSIHPQWfTSAQ9FIi8TgEf6mnEJVEM7p5qWeXY= To: Anthony Scemama , Louis Gesbert , caml-list@inria.fr References: <5693B7C5.2030105@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> <4673524.9ZabesDjnc@maitake> <569E475D.9030901@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> From: Mehdi Dogguy X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <569EA62F.1040201@dogguy.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:10:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569E475D.9030901@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Opam on Blue-Gene Hi, On 19/01/2016 15:25, Anthony Scemama wrote: > On 01/15/2016 02:48 PM, Louis Gesbert wrote: >> Hi Anthony >> >>> I don't know what else I can do to make my code run on a >>> BlueGene machine (Mira at Argonne), and I am trying to convince >>> people that HPC is not only limited to Fortran or C/C++ using MPI >>> and OpenMP :-( >> This indeed sounds like a noble cause! We've had successful builds >> on ppc64 already (power8), so the architecture should'nt be a >> problem -- you will need to get on the OCaml 4.03 dev branch >> though, as we had to write a few fixes over 4.02.3 for this. >> Can you please tell us about the patches applied on top of 4.02.3 to get it compiling? I've already compiled opam using ocaml 4.01 or 4.02 on ppc64el without any issues. So, I am a bit surprised. Maybe I've missed something though. Regards, -- Mehdi