From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F209E7EC76 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:19:36 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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 Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=mehdi@dogguy.org; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=mehdi@dogguy.org; spf=Pass smtp.helo=postmaster@dogguy.org Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mehdi@dogguy.org) identity=pra; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of mehdi@dogguy.org designates 46.105.39.113 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@dogguy.org designates 46.105.39.113 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=46.105.39.113; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mehdi@dogguy.org"; x-sender="postmaster@dogguy.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BJBwDdzp9W/3EnaS5egzqBP4hXsm0BDYFkhg8CCIE+OBQBAQEBAQEBAYEJQQEBAwkEgVqCCAEBBDIBDQEBNgIPCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMCAKIG692hSkBBIpzAQEBBwIBFwaLLoU1g1eXCY1fYH6ERIMIhVaOQR4BAUKBcoF2aYROIIIkAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0BJBwDdzp9W/3EnaS5egzqBP4hXsm0BDYFkhg8CCIE+OBQBAQEBAQEBAYEJQQEBAwkEgVqCCAEBBDIBDQEBNgIPCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMCAKIG692hSkBBIpzAQEBBwIBFwaLLoU1g1eXCY1fYH6ERIMIhVaOQR4BAUKBcoF2aYROIIIkAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,322,1449529200"; d="scan'208";a="198395536" Received: from dogguy.org ([46.105.39.113]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jan 2016 19:19:36 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.15] (89-158-41-87.rev.numericable.fr [89.158.41.87]) by dogguy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DD7F2002F; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:19:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dogguy.org; s=mail; t=1453313975; bh=Gz6FQfJDIHvFtvpdc20R4o0gcEOxvqsqJhyR4XSwV30=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lWd0NiPnoPYbaABthirgZ+jQOZzqK90XtFJOwcH53X6t/6jZFIVeRbu+uuWw3VQQE u5OGlsH3VXX5NslwgFMYcxjCwXsTRrtUwW6Tz1z8LKfvQONT6x1Bk2bEm/eCa4mCsR PBxqJ4HlFIaacD3vPXfuhuKxutJEyvCd6hhI43iI= To: Anthony Scemama , Louis Gesbert , caml-list@inria.fr References: <5693B7C5.2030105@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> <4673524.9ZabesDjnc@maitake> <569E475D.9030901@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> <569EA62F.1040201@dogguy.org> From: Mehdi Dogguy X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <569FCFB6.1020703@dogguy.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:19:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569EA62F.1040201@dogguy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Opam on Blue-Gene On 19/01/2016 22:10, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Can you please tell us about the patches applied on top of 4.02.3 to get it > compiling? I've already compiled opam using ocaml 4.01 or 4.02 on ppc64el > without any issues. So, I am a bit surprised. Maybe I've missed something > though. > FWIW, the same question applies even one consider ppc64 (big endian), s390 or s390x. In my experience, all four architectures didn't cause issues wrt. ocaml projects (or ocaml itself). So, I'm genuinely interested in hearing what could go (or went) wrong there and how observed issues were fixed. ocamlopt is certainly not available everywhere and sometimes, one has to put a little patch relevant on bytecode architectures. but i didn't see more complex or deep issues there. -- Mehdi