From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA25233; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:45:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA24637 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:45:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [128.93.8.158] (macaque.inria.fr [128.93.8.158]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7HCjZmL026297 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:45:35 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20040817120053.GA9749@annexia.org> References: <20040817120053.GA9749@annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <56BE253C-F04B-11D8-A3E6-00039310CAE8@inria.fr> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Damien Doligez Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Are map and iter guaranteed to be called in forwards order? Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:45:37 +0200 To: caml Caml X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4121FDEF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 caml-list:01 00,:99 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:03 iter:03 iter:03 functions:05 aug:05 inria:15 map:18 map:18 expected:19 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Aug 17, 2004, at 14:00, Richard Jones wrote: > Are the map and iter[1] functions guaranteed to be called in the > expected order? iter: yes map: no -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners