From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D127FFB2 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:21:59 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:YVkVsBJp19ulex+YvdmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgULvzxwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOAu60C27ud7/GocFdDyKjCmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TWM5DIfUi/yKRBybrysXNWC0ILnhqvuqtX6WEZhunmUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD86Fpy8kVWqz/e+E8TKdEJDUgKWE8osPx5jfZSg7ayGEVVOoRkwF/KQ/P6w2yCpnruy3xsetmniOdN8rqZbs5UHKs9fE4G1fTlC4bOmthoynsgctqgfcDrQ== Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=francois.bobot@cea.fr; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=francois.bobot@cea.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of francois.bobot@cea.fr) identity=pra; client-ip=132.168.224.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="francois.bobot@cea.fr"; x-sender="francois.bobot@cea.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of francois.bobot@cea.fr) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=132.168.224.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="francois.bobot@cea.fr"; x-sender="francois.bobot@cea.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=132.168.224.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="francois.bobot@cea.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BWAAAFxuJWkwjgqIRevycBDYFthg0CgSs4FAEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHDQkJIS+CLYIVAQEEIw8BBUARCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMIAoggrW6PIAELAR18iV6FBoI0gToFl0OXK4VTjnEeAQGCRREIgUmLOgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0BWAAAFxuJWkwjgqIRevycBDYFthg0CgSs4FAEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHDQkJIS+CLYIVAQEEIw8BBUARCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMIAoggrW6PIAELAR18iV6FBoI0gToFl0OXK4VTjnEeAQGCRREIgUmLOgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,320,1454972400"; d="scan'208";a="168183903" Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr ([132.168.224.8]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Mar 2016 14:21:59 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u2BDLw8T014693 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:21:58 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D347205ACE for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:22:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB3C202FDC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:22:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.8.32.80] (is222783.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.80]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u2BDLwub014869 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:21:58 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Bobot?= Message-ID: <56E2C676.3010702@cea.fr> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:21:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/44.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about Lwt/Async On 07/03/2016 18:03, Yaron Minsky wrote: > - Async is more portable than it once was. There's now Core_kernel, > Async_kernel and Async_rpc_kernel, which allows us to do things like > run Async applications in the browser. I would think Windows > support would be pretty doable by someone who understands that world > well. > > That said, the chain of dependencies brought in by Async is still > quite big. This is something that could perhaps be improved, either > with better dead code analysis in OCaml, or some tweaks to > Async_kernel and Core_kernel themselves. > Is it possible and simple to write a Lwt_Async_rpc based on Async_rpc_kernel which would expose Lwt.t functions that dispatch or serve Async_rpc rpcs? Thanks, -- François