From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA13090; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 07:26:14 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA30280 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 07:26:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from idmc.idolminds.com ([207.174.143.98]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g3D5QAL04451 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 07:26:10 +0200 (MET DST) To: "'Gurr, David (MED, self)'" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Received: From IDMC.IDOLMINDS.COM (207.174.143.98[207.174.143.98 port:3414]) by idmc.idolminds.comMail essentials (server 2.429) with SMTP id: <2157@idmc.idolminds.com>transfer for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:27:02 PM -0600 ;transfer smtpmailfrom X-MESINK_Inbound: 0 X-MESINK_MailForType: SMTP X-MESINK_SenderType: SMTP X-MESINK_Sender: ITrotts@IdolMinds.com X-MESINK_MailFor: caml-list@inria.fr Received: by IDMC with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)id <2VKXBNDA>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:27:01 -0600 From: Issac Trotts subject: RE: [Caml-list] operator overloading Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:26:49 -0600 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" x-receiver: caml-list@inria.fr x-sender: ITrotts@IdolMinds.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5e83034906119607d2@[192.168.1.6]> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Thanks, I looked into it. It looks powerful, yet risky (being in "its infancy") and intimidating compared to the simple mechanism for overloading operators in C++. It would be nice to see something more straightforward. Issac > -----Original Message----- > From: Gurr, David (MED, self) [mailto:David.Gurr@med.ge.com] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:33 PM > To: Issac Trotts; caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: RE: [Caml-list] operator overloading > > > > Try a google search for FOC and ocaml and see if that is not > a better solution to matrices, etc than overloading. -D > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Issac Trotts [mailto:ITrotts@IdolMinds.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:08 PM > > To: caml-list@inria.fr > > Subject: [Caml-list] operator overloading > > > > > > Looking at the Google results, operator overloading has come up > > as a frequently discuseed topic. Still I didn't find anything > > very useful in the posts that Google brought up. Can anyone > > recommend a way to work around OCaml's lack of operator overloading > > when dealing with matrices, vectors, and spinors? Is there a > > way to implement this with ocamlp4? > > > > Issac Trotts > > Programmer > > Idol Minds > > > > > > > > > > ------------------- > > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: > http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: > http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners