From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+lists.caml/news/@rum.cs.yale.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions
Date: 05 Jun 2001 11:02:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5lelszynor.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106041911310.5390-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com> writes:
> regardless. Coming back to the subject of this thread, in an ideal world,
> there wouldn't be a need to distinguish between Bigarray and Array, you'd
> just use polymorphic arrays and the compiler would be smart enough to
> always get unboxed and tag free element representations. Supposedly Stalin
That's also what SML/NJ tries to do. But short of doing whole program
analysis and/or profiling feedback, it's difficult to generate as good
code as in the Bigarray case.
Stefan
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-05 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-04 13:25 David McClain
2001-06-04 19:51 ` William Chesters
2001-06-04 20:05 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-04 20:15 ` David McClain
2001-06-04 22:34 ` Markus Mottl
2001-06-06 20:13 ` William Chesters
2001-06-06 22:29 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-07 7:42 ` William Chesters
2001-06-05 7:22 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-06 6:27 ` David McClain
2001-06-04 22:14 ` Tom _
2001-06-04 22:57 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-05 2:52 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-05 15:02 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2001-06-05 10:48 ` Tom _
2001-06-06 2:03 ` Hugo Herbelin
2001-06-06 4:04 ` Charles Martin
2001-06-06 18:25 ` William Chesters
2001-06-06 18:35 ` William Chesters
2001-06-06 18:40 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-06-07 1:50 ` Hugo Herbelin
2001-06-07 18:20 ` Tom _
2001-06-07 23:49 ` [Caml-list] let mutable (was OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions) Jacques Garrigue
2001-06-08 0:20 ` [Caml-list] Currying in Ocaml Mark Wotton
2001-06-08 10:13 ` Anton Moscal
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106081015000.1167-100000@hons.cs.usyd.edu.a u>
2001-06-08 0:38 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-08 8:25 ` [Caml-list] let mutable (was OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions) Ohad Rodeh
2001-06-08 15:21 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-08 17:30 ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-08 18:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2001-06-08 19:07 ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-08 19:30 ` Michel Quercia
2001-06-11 6:42 ` [Caml-list] should "a.(i)" be a reference? (was "let mutable") Judicaël Courant
2001-06-11 13:42 ` [Caml-list] let mutable (was OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions) Pierre Weis
2001-06-12 3:21 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-06-12 7:43 ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-12 8:31 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-06-12 13:15 ` Georges Brun-Cottan
2001-06-12 21:54 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-15 9:55 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-01 18:38 [Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions David McClain
2001-06-01 22:51 ` Tom _
2001-06-02 0:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2001-06-04 10:12 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5lelszynor.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--to=monnier+lists.caml/news/@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).