From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA27921; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:57:28 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA27920 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:57:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA07420 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:10:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (tequila.cs.yale.edu [128.36.229.152]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f520Ai106786 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:10:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tequila.cs.yale.edu (8.11.0/8.9.3) with SMTP id f520Ai213224 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 20:10:44 -0400 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: lists.caml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions References: <003001c0eaca$01e48220$210148bf@dylan> <20010601225159.84658.qmail@web11901.mail.yahoo.com> Date: 01 Jun 2001 20:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: <5lk82vhhc1.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Path: rum.cs.yale.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu X-Trace: 1 Jun 2001 20:10:39 -0400, rum.cs.yale.edu Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Tom" == Tom writes: > I think widespread adoption of 64bit machines will > make a huge difference for polymorphic and dynamic > languages, however. 32 bits is kind of tight for But boxing will force everything to 64bit, thus the "double memory use" will be slightly more noticeable with those languages than with C. Stefan ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr