From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA10736; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:33 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA10784 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0KLQVv29211 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from x1.einfo.com (c-24-6-118-232.client.comcast.net[24.6.118.232]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20040120212629012003cum9e>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:26:29 +0000 Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040120131101.02b80ec0@einfo.com> X-Sender: einfo@einfo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:26:51 -0800 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Byron Hale Subject: [Caml-list] Re: SPAM again? In-Reply-To: <20040118105639.GA517@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20040118105639.GA517@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; byron:01 hale:01 byron:01 hale:01 haskell:01 slows:01 caml-list:01 oliver:01 caml:01 forwarded:97 forwarded:97 ciao:02 isp:96 isp:96 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk You lucky guy. Only 60 s-p-a-m-s a day. I'm getting as many as 1000. Unfortunately, our domain name located on what seems to be an "open relay." Our ISP says they can do something about it and I am now pursuing that. After proving his famous incompleteness theorems, Kurt Godel proved a result that implies that s-p-a-m filters cannot be 100% effective. :( I had hoped to set up the domain to run Caml & Haskell based software, but that's not allowed. So, we're just stuck until I can figure a better solution that is not a lot more expensive. I won't be able to read any replies until my ISP fixes that email that won't download. Oh, yes... I moved my office in December and everything is still in chaos. That slows things down a bit too. :) Best Regards, Byron Hale At 02:56 AM 1/18/2004, you wrote: >Hi, > >this SPAM was NOT blocked. > >Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem? > >There is not so much SPAM as some weeks ago, >but it seems, that this could be the beginning >of the next flood of spam? > >If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that >hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to >delete 60 mails per day by hand? > >Ciao, > Oliver > >----- Forwarded message from Guzman ----- (not forwarded) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners