From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06818BC69 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 22:14:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4VKEF7I015974 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 22:14:15 +0200 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so243950nze for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=CfOUk6Ow1NSVl5jtD/OcsS8TV2mC3g6CXt8HeZpABbN1PGgVva+jt8y6gF1nJmIcm1VU2bFbTNrlB56jbU7p4UgQr3LOezsKdYV39tcEeztEs/HapFO4ZPeJsAlhSTElFVBIXK09igVGIQnQUHy7JkNTTqvP8FhFucgMHZ8zj3s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=JP47yt4+fFzImmkCIZW5iKuwRjjHjxaxj/VUr0bEcixKkJIQthpGF/Ui4oEBM7eb8HSA+AJW0C+4himqxutZmG1wvh9EWRobYdPNHGsXTGI5edSkPjGn/wNLcMsNtCZdsdergKf2w7KDzIKPaO0SlsHpcWbGhxU88PSZ45H3yxk= Received: by 10.114.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr927546waa.1180642454237; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.130.2 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <604682010705311314l61dd5931t9a8f8af6322baf77@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:14:14 -0400 From: "Stephen Weeks" Sender: stephentweeks@gmail.com To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics In-Reply-To: <604682010705310923o5a1ee0eiee5ae697da9d3c60@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5195a210705302250u6a9e5adey4ed857480f9e5cd8@mail.gmail.com> <465EE6A6.7050207@univ-savoie.fr> <200705311623.12442.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <465EEB55.2010904@univ-savoie.fr> <604682010705310923o5a1ee0eiee5ae697da9d3c60@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e2d035afaf010672 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 465F2C97.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 flatten:01 arrays:01 caml-list:01 tuples:01 int:01 tuple:02 comparison:04 optimized:04 preferable:04 depending:09 mlton:13 mlton:13 solution:14 does:14 > Oh, I did not see that kx was an int ... So two records in the only > solution (and it is also preferable for MLTon as I imagine that > array of tuple are not optimized ...) MLton does flatten arrays of tuples, depending on how they are used.