From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3SEgU4P012680 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:42:30 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocBAK57uU3RVdivkGdsb2JhbACleggUAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGIcJ8Km2SFdgSOXIooO4NC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,280,1301868000"; d="scan'208";a="98260429" Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 28 Apr 2011 16:42:24 +0200 Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so2911157qyk.6 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.211.135 with SMTP id go7mr2944724qab.351.1304001743598; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from osx.som.umaryland.edu ([134.192.135.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm1347087qck.8.2011.04.28.07.42.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Alexy Khrabrov , Caml List Message-Id: <6431BC03-A3FA-4ED5-A2E2-3BC9B5AFFFF5@ezabel.com> From: orbitz@ezabel.com To: Eray Ozkural In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:42:16 -0400 References: <76544177.594058.1303341821437.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr> <4DAFE141.7080003@inria.fr> <4DAFF442.8000806@lexifi.com> <799994864.610698.1303412613509.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr> <4DB136FB.6050302@inria.fr> <1303463512.8429.1344.camel@thinkpad> <97D08229-2871-42F1-A50D-8E85C6C2BE31@gmail.com> <7D1E1BE5-D04F-42FE-B36E-344E48792F8A@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient OCaml multicore -- roadmap? Hey everyone, I wrote up a short review of the paper "Efficient Parallel Programming in Poly/ML and Isabelle/ML" which discusses how multicore support was added to Poly/ML. I am not an expert so if I got details wrong please correct me but the hope is Poly/ML's story might be helpful for Ocaml. http://functional-orbitz.blogspot.com/2011/04/jc-efficient-parallel-programming-in.html On Apr 23, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Eray Ozkural wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I think Clojure is a decent language. I have no > qualms with it :) I just don't think I would use it for HPC. Even > O'Caml is too slow for writing distributed memory parallel code. I > can't imagine those other things.... > > In the end, you guys are going to make me write yet another > functional language :D >