caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrien <camaradetux@gmail.com>
To: "Xavier Leroy" <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: "Richard Jones" <rich@annexia.org>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml on ppc64 (Linux)?
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:29:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <666572260710241229r3b9c63cdjf78fbd710d5664a1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471F9006.8000905@inria.fr>

2007/10/24, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>:
Then someone told me that the Playstation 3 is a PPC64/Linux
> platform...  I'm still not quite sure whether having OCaml on
> PPC64/Linux is worth the effort, even if we had the corresponding hardware.

PlayStation3's processor (the Cell) has some parenty with powerpc but
it mostly has differences (cell is a ppc6). It has many cores and in
fact a variable number of more-or-less specialized cores.
It's a sort of revolution because its SMP capabilities are really
different from thos of a Core2Duo or of an Athlon64X2. I think there
is at least a theorical interest as it seems to perfectly fit
simultaneous processing (but maybe not so close).

There is of course wikipedia's article :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_microprocessor
It shows Cell should make its way in super-computing.

But more striking are examples of cell's power and scalability (at
least apparent):
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/print/4837
http://www.rapidmind.net/case-studies.php

I don't know of any recent and proper independant benchmarks but when
I first read about it, Cell looked like a thing we should keep an eye
on.


 ---

Adrien Nader


  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-23 16:52 Richard Jones
2007-10-24 18:33 ` [Caml-list] " Xavier Leroy
2007-10-24 19:29   ` Adrien [this message]
2007-10-24 21:13     ` Gordon Henriksen
2007-10-24 22:08       ` Christophe Raffalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=666572260710241229r3b9c63cdjf78fbd710d5664a1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=camaradetux@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=rich@annexia.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).