From: Kuba Ober <ober.14@osu.edu>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] questions
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:45:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68512E58-531D-46DA-B1DF-A16829F29939@osu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D36543.3040200@lab.vectoris.fr>
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) wrote:
> FALCON Gilles RD-RESA-LAN wrote:
>> I totally agree that it would be pleasant to have more
>> documentation on Ocaml, especially if you don't have ocaml lesson.
>
> Yes and No.
> The problem can be felt in PHP, where you see "anyone" witing
> "anything".
> So, yes, there should be more documents on Ocaml, but the problem
> is: Only
> inexperienced users have time to write down some "learning notes".
> The real Gurus are all overbooked...
>
> It's also my wish to see some documentation, but on the other hand,
> I dont
> want it to fall into PHP fashion. Great dilemma...
I generally agree, although the guru term is perhaps overused. I
figure people do
what they find enjoyable -- if someone who's very good at OCaml simply
doesn't
enjoy explaining it in the form of a manual or whatnot, there's no
helping that, and
it's surely understandable!
Cheers, Kuba
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 19:42 questions John Prince
2009-03-24 20:42 ` [Caml-list] questions Stéphane Glondu
2009-03-24 20:44 ` Jon Harrop
2009-03-25 0:17 ` Richard Jones
2009-03-25 1:11 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-03-25 0:24 ` questions Michael Ekstrand
2009-03-25 5:45 ` [Caml-list] questions David Rajchenbach-Teller
2009-03-25 17:16 ` John Prince
2009-03-27 22:14 ` xah lee
2009-03-31 13:37 ` Kuba Ober
2009-03-31 14:44 ` Martin Jambon
2009-04-01 13:49 ` Thomas Gazagnaire
2009-04-01 19:13 ` David MENTRE
2009-04-01 19:27 ` Jon Harrop
2009-04-01 20:23 ` Re : " Matthieu Wipliez
2009-04-02 7:20 ` David MENTRE
2009-04-02 8:06 ` LLC book [was: Questions] Xavier Leroy
2009-04-02 8:23 ` [Caml-list] " Alp Mestan
2009-04-04 17:17 ` Re : [Caml-list] questions Kuba Ober
2009-03-31 16:31 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-04-01 9:14 ` FALCON Gilles RD-RESA-LAN
2009-04-01 12:59 ` Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y)
2009-04-01 16:45 ` Kuba Ober [this message]
2009-04-01 13:13 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-04-01 13:42 ` Till Varoquaux
2009-04-01 16:29 ` Kuba Ober
2009-04-01 15:17 ` xahlee
2009-04-02 10:35 ` Florian Hars
2009-03-31 21:18 ` Jon Harrop
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-06 18:51 questions Igor Ozerov
2006-11-06 23:18 ` [Caml-list] questions Richard Jones
2006-11-07 8:55 ` Richard Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68512E58-531D-46DA-B1DF-A16829F29939@osu.edu \
--to=ober.14@osu.edu \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).