Re: [Caml-list] Performance penalty for using monad

[Helmut Brandl <helmut.brandl@gmx.net>]

Thanks for the hint

Helmut
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 10:31, Yotam Barnoy <yotambarnoy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You might find this
> (https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-monads-the-missing-monad-transformers-library/830/8)
> discussion relevant.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Helmut Brandl <helmut.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
>> I want to restructure my project using monads (reader, state, option, etc.) in order to get cleaner code.
>> 
>> Is there any performance penalty to pay. From my understanding there shouldn’t be any or only very little since aggressive inlining should be able to compile the monads away.
>> 
>> Is there any experience on how the optimizing ocaml compiler is able to optimize monadic code?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Helmut
>> 
>> --
>> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> 
> -- 
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs