From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA19044 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:26:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA24589 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 01:13:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from bc.mountain.net (BC.Mountain.Net [198.77.1.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA15396 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 01:13:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:tkb@AM5-5.Bridgeport-WV.Mountain.Net [198.77.46.70]) by bc.mountain.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA18758; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:12:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:08:59 -0500 Message-Id: <6934-Wed12Jan2000190859-0500-tkb@access.mountain.net> X-Mailer: emacs 20.4.1 (via feedmail 8 I) From: "T. Kurt Bond" To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99? Sender: weis [I apologize for the lack of a French version of this message.] Hello! It looks like the precompiled binaries for O'Caml 2.99 for MS Windows don't include LablTk, although the Redhat binaries did include LablTk. Earlier versions of O'Caml for MS Windows included O'CamlTk. Was this omission intentional? Result of not enough manpower? Has anyone gotten LablTk to work on MS Windows? Is the TK interface eventually going to be replaced by a Gtk+ interface? Has anyone gotten LablGtk to work on MS Windows? Does all of this depend more people helping with O'Caml development? (:-) -- T. Kurt Bond, tkb@access.mountain.net